Beate Bollig

1.1k citations
33 papers · 524 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Beate Bollig

29 papers receiving 476 citations

Peers

Beate Bollig
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
  • Software 137
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 314
  • Hardware and Architecture 87
  • Artificial Intelligence 271
  • Computer Networks and Communications 78
Replace Bernd Steinbach with:
Bernd Steinbach Germany
Ph. Schnoebelen France
Marijn J. H. Heule United States
Joël Ouaknine United Kingdom
Gerd Behrmann Denmark
Walter Vogler Germany
Josée Desharnais Canada
Jaco van de Pol Netherlands
Brigitte Plateau France
Ernst Moritz Hahn Germany
Beate Bollig relative to Bernd Steinbach Germany Bernd Steinbach's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Bernd Steinbach · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Beate Bollig

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Beate Bollig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Beate Bollig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Beate Bollig more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Beate Bollig

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Beate Bollig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Beate Bollig. The network helps show where Beate Bollig may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Beate Bollig, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Beate Bollig Line = papers co-authored together Beate Bollig links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 33 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1996314
2 201066
3 199623
4 199919
5 199813
6 200113
7 199813
8 199910
9 20117
10 20106
11
On the Power of Different Types of Restricted Branching Programs
19945
12 20035
13 20155
14 20103
15 20133
16 20042
17 20092
18 20092
19 20141
20
Integer Multiplicaton and the Complexity of Binary Decision Diagrams.
20091

About Beate Bollig

Beate Bollig is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence, Hardware and Architecture, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Software, having authored 33 papers that have together received 524 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Formal Methods in Verification (22 papers), Machine Learning and Algorithms (10 papers), Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs (10 papers), semigroups and automata theory (7 papers), Software Reliability and Analysis Research (4 papers), Low-power high-performance VLSI design (4 papers), Logic, programming, and type systems (3 papers) and Software Testing and Debugging Techniques (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Software (137 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (314 citations), Hardware and Architecture (87 citations), Artificial Intelligence (271 citations) and Computer Networks and Communications (78 citations). Beate Bollig has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Ingo Wegener, Philipp Woelfel, Detlef Sieling, Robert H. Sloan, Tiziano Villa, Jehoshua Bruck, Charles J. Colbourn, John Franco, Claude Carlet and Reinhard Pöschel. Their work appears in journals such as Theoretical Computer Science, Theory of Computing Systems, Information and Computation, Discrete Applied Mathematics and Information Processing Letters.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact