Bart de Smit

406 citations
23 papers · 108 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Bart de Smit

22 papers receiving 92 citations

Peers

Bart de Smit
Comparison fields: 5 of 17
  • Geometry and Topology 89
  • Algebra and Number Theory 38
  • Mathematical Physics 62
  • Theoretical Computer Science 6
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 16
Replace Jochen Koenigsmann with:
Jochen Koenigsmann Germany
Olivier Wittenberg France
Per Salberger Sweden
Lyubomyr Zdomskyy Austria
Jörg Jahnel Germany
Antoine Chambert-Loir France
Julien Sebag France
Alexander Berenstein Colombia
Anthony Várilly‐Alvarado United States
Alessandro Verra Italy
Bart de Smit relative to Jochen Koenigsmann Germany Jochen Koenigsmann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jochen Koenigsmann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bart de Smit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bart de Smit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bart de Smit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bart de Smit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bart de Smit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bart de Smit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bart de Smit. The network helps show where Bart de Smit may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Bart de Smit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Bart de Smit Line = papers co-authored together Bart de Smit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200021
2 199219
3 199411
4 20077
5 20006
6 20015
7 19975
8 20105
9 19934
10 19973
11 20133
12 20183
13 20083
14 20012
15 20032
16
Standard models for finite fields.
20132
17 20112
18
A differential criterion for complete intersections
19971
19 20081
20 19931

About Bart de Smit

Bart de Smit is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics, Algebra and Number Theory, Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 23 papers that have together received 108 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (12 papers), Polynomial and algebraic computation (5 papers), Finite Group Theory Research (5 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (5 papers), Commutative Algebra and Its Applications (4 papers), Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (2 papers), Geometric Analysis and Curvature Flows (2 papers) and Coding theory and cryptography (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (89 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (38 citations), Mathematical Physics (62 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (6 citations) and Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (16 citations). Bart de Smit has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include H. W. Lenstra, Gunther Cornelissen, Xin Li, Wieb Bosma, Matilde Marcolli, Willem Jan Palenstijn, Stan Wagon and Mark McClure. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Algebra, Acta Arithmetica, Journal of Number Theory, Journal of the London Mathematical Society and Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact