Barbara Bruno

1.4k total citations
71 papers, 770 citations indexed

About

Barbara Bruno is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Artificial Intelligence and Control and Systems Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Barbara Bruno has authored 71 papers receiving a total of 770 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 25 papers in Social Psychology, 25 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 18 papers in Control and Systems Engineering. Recurrent topics in Barbara Bruno's work include Social Robot Interaction and HRI (23 papers), AI in Service Interactions (14 papers) and Teaching and Learning Programming (14 papers). Barbara Bruno is often cited by papers focused on Social Robot Interaction and HRI (23 papers), AI in Service Interactions (14 papers) and Teaching and Learning Programming (14 papers). Barbara Bruno collaborates with scholars based in Switzerland, Italy and Germany. Barbara Bruno's co-authors include Fulvio Mastrogiovanni, Antonio Sgorbissa, Pierre Dillenbourg, Renato Zaccaria, Tullio Vernazza, Laila El‐Hamamsy, Jessica Dehler Zufferey, Carmine Tommaso Recchiuto, Francesco Mondada and Enrico Simetti and has published in prestigious journals such as Scientific Reports, Frontiers in Psychology and Heliyon.

In The Last Decade

Barbara Bruno

65 papers receiving 751 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Barbara Bruno Switzerland 17 247 211 193 147 139 71 770
Theocharis Kyriacou United Kingdom 14 289 1.2× 154 0.7× 103 0.5× 133 0.9× 217 1.6× 44 759
Wafa Johal Australia 19 262 1.1× 95 0.5× 349 1.8× 126 0.9× 160 1.2× 75 931
Martin Saerbeck Singapore 10 240 1.0× 197 0.9× 391 2.0× 52 0.4× 192 1.4× 22 758
Dinesh Babu Jayagopi India 16 392 1.6× 295 1.4× 265 1.4× 69 0.5× 26 0.2× 77 968
Francisco J. Rodríguez-Lera Spain 13 152 0.6× 115 0.5× 103 0.5× 70 0.5× 78 0.6× 60 491
Dennis Reidsma Netherlands 18 484 2.0× 211 1.0× 269 1.4× 41 0.3× 95 0.7× 102 1.1k
Emmanuel Senft United Kingdom 15 358 1.4× 83 0.4× 437 2.3× 42 0.3× 146 1.1× 48 742
Daniel Eaton Japan 6 348 1.4× 95 0.5× 482 2.5× 69 0.5× 258 1.9× 8 676
Patrícia Alves‐Oliveira Portugal 17 311 1.3× 70 0.3× 490 2.5× 137 0.9× 107 0.8× 60 849
Tamara Denning United States 17 183 0.7× 145 0.7× 53 0.3× 92 0.6× 32 0.2× 30 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Barbara Bruno

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Barbara Bruno's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Barbara Bruno with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Barbara Bruno more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Barbara Bruno

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Barbara Bruno. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Barbara Bruno. The network helps show where Barbara Bruno may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Barbara Bruno

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Barbara Bruno. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Barbara Bruno based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Barbara Bruno. Barbara Bruno is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
El‐Hamamsy, Laila, Estefanía Martín, Francesco Mondada, et al.. (2025). The Competent Computational Thinking Test (cCTt): A Valid, Reliable and Gender-Fair Test for Longitudinal CT Studies in Grades 3–6. Technology Knowledge and Learning. 30(3). 1607–1661. 1 indexed citations
3.
Norman, Utku, et al.. (2024). Drawings for Insight on Preschoolers' Perception of Robots. 920–924. 2 indexed citations
4.
Bruno, Barbara, et al.. (2024). Social robots as skilled ignorant peers for supporting learning. Frontiers in Robotics and AI. 11. 1385780–1385780. 1 indexed citations
6.
Bruno, Barbara, et al.. (2024). WriteUpRight: Regulating Children’s Handwriting Body Posture by Unobstrusively Error Amplification via Slow Visual Stimuli on Tablets. Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne). 1–13. 2 indexed citations
7.
Bruno, Barbara, et al.. (2023). Evaluation of teachers’ orchestration tools usage in robotic classrooms. Education and Information Technologies. 29(3). 3219–3256. 8 indexed citations
8.
Bruno, Barbara, Dominique Archambault, Mohamed Chétouani, et al.. (2023). The iReCheck project: using tablets and robots for personalised handwriting practice. Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne). 297–301. 2 indexed citations
9.
El‐Hamamsy, Laila, et al.. (2023). A Research-Practice Partnership to Introduce Computer Science in Secondary School: Lessons from a Pilot Program. ACM Transactions on Computing Education. 23(2). 1–31. 3 indexed citations
10.
El‐Hamamsy, Laila, et al.. (2023). Modelling the sustainability of a primary school digital education curricular reform and professional development program. Education and Information Technologies. 29(3). 2857–2904. 7 indexed citations
11.
Bruno, Barbara, et al.. (2023). Immediate effects of short-duration wellbeing practices on children’s handwriting and posture guided by a social robot. Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne). 1475–1480.
12.
El‐Hamamsy, Laila, et al.. (2022). The TACS Model: Understanding Primary School Teachers’ Adoption of Computer Science Pedagogical Content. ACM Transactions on Computing Education. 23(2). 1–31. 6 indexed citations
13.
Rohlfing, Katharina J., Nicole Altvater‐Mackensen, Nathan Caruana, et al.. (2022). Social/dialogical roles of social robots in supporting children’s learning of language and literacy—A review and analysis of innovative roles. Frontiers in Robotics and AI. 9. 971749–971749. 14 indexed citations
14.
Özgür, Arzu Güneysu, Maximilian J. Wessel, Jennifer K. Olsen, et al.. (2022). The effect of gamified robot-enhanced training on motor performance in chronic stroke survivors. Heliyon. 8(11). e11764–e11764. 5 indexed citations
15.
Norman, Utku, et al.. (2020). "You Tell, I Do, and We Swap until we Connect All the Gold Mines!".. Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne). 2020. 2 indexed citations
16.
Özgür, Arzu Güneysu, Barbara Bruno, Thibault Asselborn, & Pierre Dillenbourg. (2020). Can Tangible Robots Support Children in Learning Handwriting. Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne). 2020(120). 20–21. 3 indexed citations
17.
El‐Hamamsy, Laila, Barbara Bruno, Morgane Chevalier, et al.. (2020). A computer science and robotics integration model for primary school: evaluation of a large-scale in-service K-4 teacher-training program. Education and Information Technologies. 26(3). 2445–2475. 36 indexed citations
18.
Özgür, Arzu Güneysu, et al.. (2020). Iterative Design and Evaluation of a Tangible Robot-Assisted Handwriting Activity for Special Education. Frontiers in Robotics and AI. 7. 29–29. 25 indexed citations
19.
Bruno, Barbara, et al.. (2020). Robot Agreeableness and User Engagement in Verbal Human-Robot Interaction. Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne). 256–263. 5 indexed citations
20.
Recchiuto, Carmine Tommaso, Barbara Bruno, Renato Zaccaria, et al.. (2018). Collaborative Development Within a Social Robotic, Multi-Disciplinary Effort: the CARESSES Case Study. 117–124. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026