Balázs Bernáth
- Ecology top 10%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Genetics
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Insect Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- Gábor HorváthGyörgy KriskaAndrás BartaRóbert FarkasVictor Benno Meyer‐RochowHansruedi WildermuthJózsef GálZoltán Csabai
- Topics
- Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (9 papers)Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (9 papers)Remote Sensing in Agriculture (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- HungaryGermanySwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Balázs Bernáth
30 papers receiving 556 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Ecology 204
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 203
- Genetics 152
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 125
- Insect Science 112
Countries citing papers authored by Balázs Bernáth
This map shows the geographic impact of Balázs Bernáth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Balázs Bernáth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Balázs Bernáth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Balázs Bernáth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Balázs Bernáth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Balázs Bernáth. The network helps show where Balázs Bernáth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Balázs Bernáth
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Balázs Bernáth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Balázs Bernáth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Balázs Bernáth. Balázs Bernáth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 18 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 38 | |
| 12 | 73 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 21 | |
| 15 | 33 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 40 | |
| 20 | Visual ecological impact of a peculiar waste oil lake on the avifauna: Dual-choice field experiments with water-seeking birds using huge shiny black and white plastic sheets | 3 |
About Balázs Bernáth
Balázs Bernáth is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Equine and Ecology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 576 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (9 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (9 papers) and Remote Sensing in Agriculture (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (63 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (203 citations) and Insect Science (112 citations). Balázs Bernáth has collaborated with scholars based in Hungary, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Gábor Horváth, György Kriska, András Barta, Róbert Farkas, Victor Benno Meyer‐Rochow, Hansruedi Wildermuth, József Gál, Zoltán Csabai, Pál Boda and Ádám Egri. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biomechanics, Frontiers in Plant Science and Vision Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.