Bachar Alrouh

415 total citations
31 papers, 293 citations indexed

About

Bachar Alrouh is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Bachar Alrouh has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 293 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in General Health Professions, 10 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 9 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Bachar Alrouh's work include Child Abuse and Trauma (7 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (7 papers) and Child Welfare and Adoption (6 papers). Bachar Alrouh is often cited by papers focused on Child Abuse and Trauma (7 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (7 papers) and Child Welfare and Adoption (6 papers). Bachar Alrouh collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Brunei. Bachar Alrouh's co-authors include Judith Harwin, Karen Broadhurst, Claire Mason, Mike Shaw, Mary Ryan, Mark Pilling, Linda Cusworth, Lucy Griffiths, Subhash Pokhrel and David Ford and has published in prestigious journals such as BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, Children and Youth Services Review and The British Journal of Social Work.

In The Last Decade

Bachar Alrouh

30 papers receiving 267 citations

Peers

Bachar Alrouh
Andrea Lane Eastman United States
Bridgette Lery United States
Daniel Webster United States
Joseph Magruder United States
Amy D’Andrade United States
Scott Burrus United States
Rosamund Thorpe Australia
Anna Rockhill United States
Megan Finno-Velasquez United States
Andrea Lane Eastman United States
Bachar Alrouh
Citations per year, relative to Bachar Alrouh Bachar Alrouh (= 1×) peers Andrea Lane Eastman

Countries citing papers authored by Bachar Alrouh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bachar Alrouh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bachar Alrouh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bachar Alrouh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bachar Alrouh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bachar Alrouh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bachar Alrouh. The network helps show where Bachar Alrouh may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Bachar Alrouh

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Bachar Alrouh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Bachar Alrouh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Bachar Alrouh. Bachar Alrouh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Alrouh, Bachar, et al.. (2023). Area‐deprivation, social care spending and the rates of children in care proceedings in local authorities in England. Children & Society. 38(2). 578–595. 3 indexed citations
2.
Johnson, Rhodri, Laura North, Bachar Alrouh, et al.. (2022). A population level study into health vulnerabilities of mothers and fathers involved in public law care proceedings in Wales, UK between 2011 and 2019. International Journal for Population Data Science. 7(1). 1723–1723. 2 indexed citations
3.
Alrouh, Bachar, et al.. (2022). Born into care: Associations between area-level deprivation and the rates of children entering care proceedings in Wales. Children and Youth Services Review. 141. 106595–106595. 7 indexed citations
4.
Alrouh, Bachar, et al.. (2021). Explaining High Rates of Infants in Care Proceedings in Deprived Areas of Wales. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University). 1 indexed citations
5.
Griffiths, Lucy, Richard D. Johnson, Karen Broadhurst, et al.. (2020). Maternal health, pregnancy and birth outcomes for women involved in care proceedings in Wales: a linked data study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 20(1). 697–697. 20 indexed citations
6.
Johnson, Rhodri, Liz Trinder, Alexandra Lee, et al.. (2020). Data Resource: population level family justice administrative data with opportunities for data linkage. International Journal for Population Data Science. 5(1). 1339–1339. 16 indexed citations
7.
Harwin, Judith, et al.. (2018). Child and Parent Outcomes in the London Family Drug and Alcohol Court Five Years On: Building on International Evidence. International Journal of Law Policy and the Family. 32(2). 140–169. 16 indexed citations
8.
Harwin, Judith & Bachar Alrouh. (2017). New entrants and repeat children: continuity and change in care demand over time. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University). 47(4). 407–411. 3 indexed citations
9.
Harwin, Judith & Bachar Alrouh. (2017). Supervision orders and special guardianship: how risky are they? Findings from a national study of supervision orders and special guardianship. The Family in Law. 47(5). 513–518. 3 indexed citations
10.
Broadhurst, Karen, et al.. (2017). Vulnerable birth mothers and recurrent care proceedings: final main report. Staff Publications Online (The Tavistock and Portman). 12 indexed citations
11.
Harwin, Judith, Bachar Alrouh, Melanie Palmer, Karen Broadhurst, & Stephen Swift. (2016). Considering the case for parity in policy and practice between adoption and special guardianship:findings from a population wide study. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University). 46(2). 204–207. 3 indexed citations
12.
Broadhurst, Karen, et al.. (2016). Women and infants in care proceedings in England : new insights from research on recurrent care proceedings. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University). 46(2). 208–211. 5 indexed citations
13.
Broadhurst, Karen, et al.. (2014). Recurrent Care Proceedings:Part 4: the emergence of child protection as a public health issue: how would a more prevention-oriented approach alter the provision of services and the family-professional relationship?. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University). 44(12). 1705–1708. 1 indexed citations
14.
Broadhurst, Karen, et al.. (2014). Recurrent care proceedings:Part 1: Progress in research and practice since the Family Justice Council 6th Annual Debate. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University). 44(9). 1284–1287. 3 indexed citations
15.
Harwin, Judith, et al.. (2014). Recurrent care proceedings: Part 2: Young motherhood and the role of the court. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University). 44(10). 1439–1443. 2 indexed citations
16.
Broadhurst, Karen, Judith Harwin, Mike Shaw, & Bachar Alrouh. (2014). Capturing the scale and pattern of recurrent care proceedings: initial observations from a feasibility study. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University). 8 indexed citations
17.
Harwin, Judith, et al.. (2014). Report: Capturing the Scale and Pattern of Recurrent Care Proceedings. Children and Young People Now. 2014(16). 28–28. 4 indexed citations
18.
Harwin, Judith, et al.. (2013). Strengthening prospects for safe and lasting family reunification: can a Family Drug and Alcohol Court make a contribution?. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 35(4). 459–474. 19 indexed citations
19.
Harwin, Judith, et al.. (2011). The Family Drug and Alcohol Court (FDAC) Evaluation Project Final Report. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 21 indexed citations
20.
Harwin, Judith, et al.. (2011). The family drug & alcohol court (FDAC) evaluation project. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026