David Ford
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 5%
- Epidemiology top 10%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Health top 2%
- Co-authors
- Kerina JonesRonan A LyonsCaroline BrooksGareth JohnSimon ThompsonRod MiddletonAnn JohnJ. Gareth Noble
- Topics
- Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (13 papers)Health disparities and outcomes (11 papers)Ethics in Clinical Research (11 papers)
- Journals
- The LancetNature MedicinePLoS ONE
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaCanada
In The Last Decade
David Ford
73 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
- General Health Professions 532
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 421
- Epidemiology 416
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 328
- Health 313
Countries citing papers authored by David Ford
This map shows the geographic impact of David Ford's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Ford with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Ford more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by David Ford
This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Ford. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Ford. The network helps show where David Ford may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of David Ford
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of David Ford. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of David Ford based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with David Ford. David Ford is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 20 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 41 | |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | 23 | |
| 17 | A Comparison of participant supplied EDSS scores and clinically submitted data via the UK MS Register | 15 |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | Studying men and masculinity A sourcebook of literature and materials | 1 |
| 20 | REQUIREMENTS, CRITERIA, AND MEASURES OF PERFORMANCE OF INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL SYSTEMS | 5 |
About David Ford
David Ford is a scholar working on Health, Health Information Management and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 76 papers that have together received 2.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies (13 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (11 papers) and Ethics in Clinical Research (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (313 citations), Pathology and Forensic Medicine (421 citations) and Health Information Management (107 citations). David Ford has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Kerina Jones, Ronan A Lyons, Caroline Brooks, Gareth John, Simon Thompson, Rod Middleton, Ann John, J. Gareth Noble, Hazel Lockhart-Jones and Lisa A. Osborne. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Nature Medicine and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.