B. Van Baelen
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Physiology
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
- Neurology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Martin BrecherR. De CosterDavid L. KleinbergS. SchwalenJohn M. DavisShane KavanaghHoward FeldmanAlexander Kurz
- Topics
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (12 papers)Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (8 papers)Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- GermanyBelgiumUnited States
In The Last Decade
B. Van Baelen
31 papers receiving 972 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Psychiatry and Mental health 565
- Pharmacology 301
- Physiology 150
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 84
- Neurology 83
Countries citing papers authored by B. Van Baelen
This map shows the geographic impact of B. Van Baelen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. Van Baelen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. Van Baelen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by B. Van Baelen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. Van Baelen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. Van Baelen. The network helps show where B. Van Baelen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of B. Van Baelen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of B. Van Baelen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of B. Van Baelen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with B. Van Baelen. B. Van Baelen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 38 | |
| 2 | 17 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | CFD models for wallshear stress estimation; a comparitive study of two complete scaffold geometries | 1 |
| 7 | CFD Models for Wall Shear Stress Estimation; a Comparative study of two Complete Scaffold geometries | 1 |
| 8 | 26 | |
| 9 | 38 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 46 | |
| 12 | 107 | |
| 13 | 88 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 32 | |
| 16 | 50 | |
| 17 | 46 | |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | 59 | |
| 20 | 242 |
About B. Van Baelen
B. Van Baelen is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Hepatology and Pharmacology, having authored 31 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (12 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (8 papers) and Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (565 citations), Geriatrics and Gerontology (73 citations) and Pharmacology (301 citations). B. Van Baelen has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Belgium and United States. Frequent co-authors include Martin Brecher, R. De Coster, David L. Kleinberg, S. Schwalen, John M. Davis, Shane Kavanagh, Howard Feldman, Alexander Kurz, Koen Torfs and J. Peuskens. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Psychiatry, The Lancet Neurology and Journal of Hepatology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.