Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Analysis of a sleep-dependent neuronal feedback loop: the slow-wave microcontinuity of the EEG
2000581 citationsB. Kemp, A. H. Zwinderman et al.IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineeringprofile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of B. Kemp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. Kemp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. Kemp more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. Kemp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. Kemp. The network helps show where B. Kemp may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of B. Kemp
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of B. Kemp.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of B. Kemp based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with B. Kemp. B. Kemp is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kemp, B. & Chris Jones. (2007). Academic Use of Digital Resources: Disciplinary Differences and the Issue of Progression Revisited. Educational Technology & Society. 10(1). 52–60.29 indexed citations
4.
Brand, H. van den & B. Kemp. (2005). Dietary fat and reproduction in the post partum sow. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling.1 indexed citations
5.
Gerritsen, R., N.M. Soede, P. Langendijk, M.A.M. Taverne, & B. Kemp. (2005). Lactational Oestrus in Intermittently Suckled Sows: Pregnancy Rate and Early Embryo Survival. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 40(4).1 indexed citations
6.
Kemp, B.. (2004). SignalML from an EDF+ perspective. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine. 76(3). 261–263.3 indexed citations
Penzel, Thomas, B. Kemp, Gerhard Klösch, et al.. (2001). Acquisition of biomedical signals databases. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine. 20(3). 25–32.44 indexed citations
10.
Soede, N.M., Hélène Quesnel, Armelle Prunier, & B. Kemp. (2000). Variation in Weaning-To-Oestrus intervals in sows : causes and consequences. Reproduction in Domestic Animals. 35. 111–117.4 indexed citations
11.
Kemp, B., A. H. Zwinderman, Bert Tuk, H.A.C. Kamphuisen, & Janine Oberyé. (2000). Analysis of a sleep-dependent neuronal feedback loop: the slow-wave microcontinuity of the EEG. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering. 47(9). 1185–1194.581 indexed citations breakdown →
12.
Albrecht, M., et al.. (1999). Java for astronomy: software development at ESO/ST-ECF.. Msngr. 98. 30–32.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.