B. Benoit

2.6k total citations · 1 hit paper
44 papers, 1.8k citations indexed

About

B. Benoit is a scholar working on Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Genetics and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, B. Benoit has authored 44 papers receiving a total of 1.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, 9 papers in Genetics and 7 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in B. Benoit's work include Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (15 papers), Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (13 papers) and Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments (6 papers). B. Benoit is often cited by papers focused on Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (15 papers), Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders (13 papers) and Craniofacial Disorders and Treatments (6 papers). B. Benoit collaborates with scholars based in France, Monaco and United Kingdom. B. Benoit's co-authors include Rabih Chaoui, K. H. Nicolaides, K. S. Heling, Patrick Saulnier, C. Faro, Piotr Węgrzyn, J. E. Proust, Jean‐Pierre Benoît, Brigitte Pech and Philippe Legrand and has published in prestigious journals such as Biomaterials, Langmuir and International Journal of Pharmaceutics.

In The Last Decade

B. Benoit

43 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Hit Papers

Physico-chemical stability of colloidal lipid particles 2003 2026 2010 2018 2003 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
B. Benoit France 19 559 399 335 307 244 44 1.8k
Michael J. Rathbone New Zealand 22 98 0.2× 272 0.7× 882 2.6× 255 0.8× 92 0.4× 61 1.8k
Hajime Toguchi Japan 26 84 0.2× 688 1.7× 1.4k 4.0× 633 2.1× 138 0.6× 61 2.6k
Hiromitsu Yamamoto Japan 23 56 0.1× 735 1.8× 1.4k 4.2× 715 2.3× 170 0.7× 47 2.4k
Paul A. Burke United States 14 72 0.1× 1.4k 3.5× 553 1.7× 637 2.1× 130 0.5× 21 2.6k
Christiane Damgé France 25 73 0.1× 671 1.7× 1.2k 3.7× 559 1.8× 197 0.8× 55 2.3k
Elke Walter Switzerland 24 62 0.1× 1.2k 3.1× 769 2.3× 734 2.4× 115 0.5× 34 2.9k
Stanley S. Davis United Kingdom 14 49 0.1× 659 1.7× 1.4k 4.3× 542 1.8× 190 0.8× 18 2.4k
Michael Mezei Canada 21 124 0.2× 659 1.7× 1.3k 3.8× 226 0.7× 113 0.5× 58 2.1k
A. A. Hıncal Türkiye 26 70 0.1× 551 1.4× 1.3k 3.9× 764 2.5× 185 0.8× 77 2.4k
Andrew J. S. Jones United States 26 49 0.1× 1.7k 4.2× 506 1.5× 302 1.0× 137 0.6× 67 2.8k

Countries citing papers authored by B. Benoit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of B. Benoit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. Benoit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. Benoit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by B. Benoit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. Benoit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. Benoit. The network helps show where B. Benoit may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of B. Benoit

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of B. Benoit. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of B. Benoit based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with B. Benoit. B. Benoit is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Karl, K., B. Benoit, Michael Entezami, K. S. Heling, & Rabih Chaoui. (2012). Small biparietal diameter in fetuses with spina bifida on 11–13‐week and mid‐gestation ultrasound. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 40(2). 140–144. 35 indexed citations
3.
Chaoui, Rabih, B. Benoit, K. S. Heling, et al.. (2011). Prospective detection of open spina bifida at 11–13 weeks by assessing intracranial translucency and posterior brain. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 38(6). 722–726. 58 indexed citations
4.
Shojai, R., B. Benoit, R. Chaoui, Florence Bretelle, & C D’Ercole. (2010). P25.17: Intracranial translucency and open spina bifida. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 36(S1). 269–269. 1 indexed citations
5.
Chaoui, Rabih, et al.. (2009). Assessment of intracranial translucency (IT) in the detection of spina bifida at the 11–13‐week scan. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 34(3). 249–252. 184 indexed citations
6.
Kivilevitch, Z., L. J. Salomon, B. Benoit, & R. Achiron. (2009). Fetal interlens distance: normal values during pregnancy. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 36(2). 186–190. 8 indexed citations
7.
Merz, E., B. Benoit, H.‐G. K. Blaas, et al.. (2007). Standardization of three‐dimensional images in obstetrics and gynecology: consensus statement. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 29(6). 697–703. 26 indexed citations
8.
Benoit, B., et al.. (2006). Prise en charge des kystes ovariens. Journal de Chirurgie. 143(5). 278–284. 11 indexed citations
9.
Chaoui, Rabih, J. M. Levaillant, B. Benoit, et al.. (2005). Three‐dimensional sonographic description of abnormal metopic suture in second‐ and third‐trimester fetuses. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 26(7). 761–764. 36 indexed citations
10.
Faro, C., Piotr Węgrzyn, B. Benoit, Rabih Chaoui, & K. H. Nicolaides. (2005). Metopic suture in fetuses with holoprosencephaly at 11 + 0 to 13 + 6 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 27(2). 162–166. 17 indexed citations
11.
Faro, C., Rabih Chaoui, Piotr Węgrzyn, et al.. (2005). Metopic suture in fetuses with Apert syndrome at 22–27 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 27(1). 28–33. 38 indexed citations
12.
Benoit, B.. (2005). OC1.01: Developments in 3D ultrasound in obstetrics. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 26(4). 309–309. 1 indexed citations
13.
Johnson, Jo‐Ann, et al.. (2004). Early prenatal diagnosis of oculoauriculofrontonasal syndrome by three‐dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 25(2). 184–186. 7 indexed citations
14.
Benoit, B.. (2003). Physico-chemical stability of colloidal lipid particles. Biomaterials. 24(23). 4283–4300. 657 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Benoit, B., et al.. (2002). Three-dimensional sonoembryology. Journal of Perinatal Medicine. 30(1). 63–73. 34 indexed citations
16.
Benoit, B., Patrick Saulnier, Brigitte Pech, J. E. Proust, & Jean‐Pierre Benoît. (2002). Properties of polyethylene glycol 660 12-hydroxy stearate at a triglyceride/water interface. International Journal of Pharmaceutics. 242(1-2). 167–170. 25 indexed citations
17.
Bongain, A., et al.. (2002). Harlequin fetus: three‐dimensional sonographic findings and new diagnostic approach. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 20(1). 82–85. 48 indexed citations
18.
Benoit, B., Philippe Legrand, Vanessa Carla Furtado Mosqueira, et al.. (2001). The antileishmanial properties of surface-modified, primaquine-loaded nanocapsules tested against intramacrophagic Leishmania donovani amastigotes in vitro. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology. 95(5). 529–533. 10 indexed citations
19.
Fénichel, Patrick, et al.. (1988). [Systematic inhibition of the luteinizing hormone with a gonadoliberin analog, triptorelin, during ovarian stimulation for fertilization in vitro. Choice of protocol].. PubMed. 17(15). 719–22. 7 indexed citations
20.
Fénichel, Patrick, et al.. (1986). Blocage hypophysaire par un analogue de la gonadoréline, le D-Trp6-LHRH retard, en vue d'une amélioration de l'induction de l'ovulation.. La Presse Médicale. 15(43). 2167–2167. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026