Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Environmental Income and Rural Livelihoods: A Global-Comparative Analysis
2014792 citationsArild Angelsen, Pamela Jagger et al.World Developmentprofile →
Livelihoods, forests, and conservation in developing countries: An Overview
2005736 citationsArild Angelsen, B. Belcher et al.World Developmentprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of B. Belcher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. Belcher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. Belcher more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. Belcher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. Belcher. The network helps show where B. Belcher may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of B. Belcher
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of B. Belcher.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of B. Belcher based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with B. Belcher. B. Belcher is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Martius, Christopher, et al.. (2018). Pathway to impact: Is REDD+ a viable theory of change?. CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research).7 indexed citations
Angelsen, Arild, Pamela Jagger, Ronnie Babigumira, et al.. (2014). Environmental Income and Rural Livelihoods: A Global-Comparative Analysis. World Development. 64(Suppl 1). S12–S28.792 indexed citations breakdown →
Ojha, Hemant, et al.. (2008). Community-based Forest Management Programmes in Nepal: An Overview of Contexts, Policies, Practices and Issues. CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research).5 indexed citations
Kusters, Koen, Ramadhani Achdiawan, B. Belcher, & M. Ruiz Pérez. (2006). Balancing Development and Conservation? An Assessment of Livelihood and Environmental Outcomes of Nontimber Forest Product Trade in Asia, Africa, and Latin America. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).1 indexed citations
15.
Cunningham, Anthony B., Bruce Campbell, & B. Belcher. (2005). Carving Out a Future: Forests, Livelihoods and the International Woodcarving Trade. CDU eSpace Institutional Repository (Charles Darwin University).17 indexed citations
16.
Belcher, B.. (2001). Rattan cultivation and livelihoods: the changing scenario in Kalimantan. CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research). 52(205).5 indexed citations
17.
Wollenberg, Eva & B. Belcher. (2001). NTFPs – income for rural populations or not. CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research).3 indexed citations
Pérez, Manuel Ruíz, et al.. (1996). Policy change in China: the effects on the bamboo sector in Anji county. Journal of Forest Economics. 2(2).16 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.