Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: An overview of the issues
20081.6k citationsStefanie Engel, Sven Wunder et al.profile →
Payments for environmental services: some nuts and bolts
This map shows the geographic impact of Sven Wunder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sven Wunder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sven Wunder more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sven Wunder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sven Wunder. The network helps show where Sven Wunder may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sven Wunder
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sven Wunder.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sven Wunder based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Sven Wunder. Sven Wunder is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
West, Thales A. P., Sven Wunder, Erin O. Sills, et al.. (2023). Action needed to make carbon offsets from forest conservation work for climate change mitigation. Science. 381(6660). 873–877.172 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
Meijaard, Erik, Rona Dennis, Marc Ancrenaz, et al.. (2023). Apes and agriculture. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4.4 indexed citations
5.
Hasler, Berit, Mette Termansen, Helle Ørsted Nielsen, et al.. (2022). European Agri-environmental Policy: Evolution, Effectiveness, and Challenges. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy. 16(1). 105–125.86 indexed citations breakdown →
Wunder, Sven, Roy Brouwer, Stefanie Engel, et al.. (2018). From principles to practice in paying for nature’s services. Nature Sustainability. 1(3). 145–150.234 indexed citations breakdown →
Motta, Ronaldo Serôa da, Arild Angelsen, Kornelis Blok, et al.. (2012). Bridging the emission gap. Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology).1 indexed citations
16.
Wunder, Sven, et al.. (2007). Pago por servicios ambientales: una nueva forma de conservar la biodiversidad. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 39–52.12 indexed citations
17.
Wünscher, Tobias, Stefanie Engel, & Sven Wunder. (2006). Payments for environmental services in Costa Rica: increasing efficiency through spatial differentiation. CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research). 45(4).28 indexed citations
18.
Chen, Shaohua, David Greenaway, Martin Ravallion, et al.. (2004). The World Bank research observer 19 (2). The World Bank Research Observer. 19. 1.1 indexed citations
Wunder, Sven. (1992). La enfermedad holandesa y el caso colombiano. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 22(1). 167–190.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.