Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Livelihoods, forests, and conservation in developing countries: An Overview
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Nasi's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Nasi with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Nasi more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Nasi. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Nasi. The network helps show where Robert Nasi may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Nasi
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Nasi.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Nasi based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Nasi. Robert Nasi is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Vliet, Nathalie van, et al.. (2018). What role do wild animals (fish and wildmeat) play in the food security of urban teenagers living in poverty and conflict - the case of Quibdó, Colombia. Ethnobiology and Conservation. 7.2 indexed citations
Wasseige, Carlos de, Nicolas Bayol, Philippe Mayaux, et al.. (2012). The Forests of the Congo Basin: State of the Forest 2010. Agritrop (Cirad).156 indexed citations
11.
Nasi, Robert & Nathalie van Vliet. (2011). Measuring the abundance of wildlife populations in Central African logging concessions.. 62(238). 49–55.5 indexed citations
Nasi, Robert, et al.. (2006). Exploitation et gestion durable des forêts en Afrique Centrale : la quête de la durabilité. Agritrop (Cirad).2 indexed citations
14.
Nasi, Robert, et al.. (2002). Forest fire and biological diversity. 53(209).27 indexed citations
15.
Fuhr, Marc, et al.. (2001). Recent origin of most of the forest cover in the Gabon coastal area. Oecologia. 129(1).1 indexed citations
16.
Nasi, Robert, et al.. (1999). L'amenagement forestier au Gabon: historique, bilan, perpectives. CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research).8 indexed citations
17.
Tchatat, M., Ousseynou Ndoye, & Robert Nasi. (1999). Produits Forestiers Autres que le Bois d'oeuvre (PFAB): place dans l'amenagement durable des forets humides d'Afrique Centrale. CGSPace A Repository of Agricultural Research Outputs (Consultative Group for International Agricultural Research).5 indexed citations
Nasi, Robert. (1994). Some aspects of root architecture and growth strategies of Malaysian rattans. Acta Oecologica. 15(6). 753–766.2 indexed citations
20.
Nasi, Robert, et al.. (1988). Projet inventaire des ressources ligneuses au Mali - inventaire des formations végétales. Agritrop (Cirad).2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.