Avijit Chatterjee

1.0k citations
62 papers · 334 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Avijit Chatterjee

53 papers receiving 309 citations

Peers

Avijit Chatterjee
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Health Informatics 8
  • Computational Mechanics 90
  • Applied Mathematics 32
  • Algebra and Number Theory 13
  • Mathematical Physics 15
Replace Manoj Bhardwaj with:
Manoj Bhardwaj India
K. Scherer Germany
Macarena Trujillo Spain
Jed D. Pack United States
Ben Polman Netherlands
Shuonan Wu China
Guillaume Dufour France
Shawn D. Pautz United States
A. S. Al-Fhaid Saudi Arabia
Avijit Chatterjee relative to Manoj Bhardwaj India Manoj Bhardwaj's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.4×
Manoj Bhardwaj · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Avijit Chatterjee

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Avijit Chatterjee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Avijit Chatterjee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Avijit Chatterjee more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Avijit Chatterjee

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Avijit Chatterjee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Avijit Chatterjee. The network helps show where Avijit Chatterjee may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Avijit Chatterjee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Avijit Chatterjee Line = papers co-authored together Avijit Chatterjee links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 62 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199935
2 200822
3 201921
4 202020
5 198018
6 199316
7 200815
8 200714
9 202012
10 201810
11 201410
12 20099
13 20049
14 20188
15 20178
16 20098
17 20187
18 19956
19 20115
20 20205

About Avijit Chatterjee

Avijit Chatterjee is a scholar working on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Computational Mechanics, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Surgery, having authored 62 papers that have together received 334 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods (11 papers), Photonic and Optical Devices (10 papers), Electromagnetic Scattering and Analysis (8 papers), Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics (8 papers), Esophageal and GI Pathology (5 papers), Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research (5 papers), Aerodynamics and Acoustics in Jet Flows (4 papers) and Lightning and Electromagnetic Phenomena (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health Informatics (8 citations), Computational Mechanics (90 citations), Applied Mathematics (32 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (13 citations) and Mathematical Physics (15 citations). Avijit Chatterjee has collaborated with scholars based in India, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Shankar Kumar Selvaraja, Ashish Singh, Roger R. Smith, Sujit Kumar Sikdar, Paul D. James, Brian R. White, D. Wake, R.S. Myong, David R. Smith and Digbijoy N. Nath. Their work appears in journals such as Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, Progress In Electromagnetics Research B, Shock Waves, IEEE Sensors Journal and Current Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact