Austin J. Roberts
- Geography, Planning and Development top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Global and Planetary Change
- Political Science and International Relations
- Co-authors
- Edwin O. ChaharbakhshiMatthew J. DietzNicholas A. BedardEric R. SiegelJeffrey B. StamboughCatherine KellerRobert Cummings NevilleSimon C. Mears
- Topics
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil (3 papers)Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (3 papers)Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (2 papers)
- Journals
- The Journal of ArthroplastyThe Journal of Knee SurgeryProcess Studies
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Austin J. Roberts
5 papers receiving 137 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Geography, Planning and Development 54
- Sociology and Political Science 52
- Literature and Literary Theory 35
- Global and Planetary Change 23
- Political Science and International Relations 20
Countries citing papers authored by Austin J. Roberts
This map shows the geographic impact of Austin J. Roberts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Austin J. Roberts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Austin J. Roberts more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Austin J. Roberts
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Austin J. Roberts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Austin J. Roberts. The network helps show where Austin J. Roberts may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Austin J. Roberts
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Austin J. Roberts. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Austin J. Roberts based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Austin J. Roberts. Austin J. Roberts is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 157 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | A Philosophy of Sacred Nature: Prospects for Ecstatic Naturalism | 1 |
About Austin J. Roberts
Austin J. Roberts is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science and Religious studies, having authored 7 papers that have together received 164 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theology and Philosophy of Evil (3 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (3 papers) and Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geography, Planning and Development (54 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (35 citations) and Cultural Studies (18 citations). Austin J. Roberts has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Edwin O. Chaharbakhshi, Matthew J. Dietz, Nicholas A. Bedard, Eric R. Siegel, Jeffrey B. Stambough, Catherine Keller, Robert Cummings Neville, Simon C. Mears and Wesley J. Wildman. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Arthroplasty, The Journal of Knee Surgery and Process Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.