Natalie D. Pope
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Demography top 5%
- Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jarod T. GigerJ. Jay MillerJoann LianekhammyErlene Grise-OwensPaula K. BaldwinLatrice RollinsGretchen E. ElyLisa A. Newland
- Topics
- Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (10 papers)Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (9 papers)Social Work Education and Practice (7 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaComputers in Human BehaviorThe Journals of Gerontology Series B
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth KoreaIreland
In The Last Decade
Natalie D. Pope
37 papers receiving 442 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- General Health Professions 178
- Sociology and Political Science 153
- Clinical Psychology 132
- Demography 100
- Health 90
Countries citing papers authored by Natalie D. Pope
This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie D. Pope's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie D. Pope with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie D. Pope more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie D. Pope
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie D. Pope. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie D. Pope. The network helps show where Natalie D. Pope may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie D. Pope
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie D. Pope. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie D. Pope based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie D. Pope. Natalie D. Pope is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 13 | |
| 10 | 17 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 51 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 24 | |
| 19 | 37 | |
| 20 | 58 |
About Natalie D. Pope
Natalie D. Pope is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Public Administration and Health, having authored 41 papers that have together received 470 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (10 papers), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (9 papers) and Social Work Education and Practice (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (73 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (26 citations) and Health (90 citations). Natalie D. Pope has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Jarod T. Giger, J. Jay Miller, Joann Lianekhammy, Erlene Grise-Owens, Paula K. Baldwin, Latrice Rollins, Gretchen E. Ely, Lisa A. Newland, Karen A. Lawrence and Stacey Kolomer. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Computers in Human Behavior and The Journals of Gerontology Series B.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.