This map shows the geographic impact of Associates's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Associates with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Associates more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Associates. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Associates. The network helps show where Associates may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Associates
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Associates.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Associates based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Associates. Associates is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Associates, et al.. (2004). RIVERS_OUTSTANDING_NRC_IN: Outstanding Rivers in Indiana Listed by the Natural Resource Commission (Bernardin-Lochmueller and Associates, 1:100,000, Line Shapefile).1 indexed citations
5.
Beck, A T, et al.. (2003). Cognitive Therapy for Personality Disorders. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).92 indexed citations
6.
Associates, et al.. (1999). ASSESSMENT OF GHG MODELS FOR THE SURFACE TRANSPORTATION SECTOR.1 indexed citations
7.
Associates, et al.. (1998). Guidance for estimating the indirect effects of proposed transportation projects.8 indexed citations
8.
Harris, Franklin D., et al.. (1997). Helicopters Cost Too Much.2 indexed citations
9.
Associates, et al.. (1993). All-season tourism : analysis of experience, suitable products and clientele. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities eBooks.9 indexed citations
10.
Associates, et al.. (1993). Tourism in the European Community : the impact of the single market.2 indexed citations
Associates, et al.. (1992). Separation technologies; An opportunity for energy savings. Chemical engineering progress. 88(3). 32–41.49 indexed citations
Associates, et al.. (1984). Fitness in America--the Perrier study : a national research report of behavior, knowledge, and opinions concerning the taking up of sports and exercise.5 indexed citations
15.
Associates, et al.. (1984). Neue Staatsgalerie Stuttgart. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas).1 indexed citations
16.
Associates, et al.. (1981). A survey of spousal violence against women in Kentucky : conducted for Kentucky Commission on Women. Garland Pub. eBooks.14 indexed citations
17.
Harris, Louis S. & Associates. (1980). A Study of the attitudes toward and an assessment of the Financial Accounting Standards Board.8 indexed citations
18.
Associates, et al.. (1974). A study of damage to a residential structure from blast vibrations : for the Research Council for Performance of Structures of the American Society of Civil Engineers. American Society of Civil Engineers eBooks.1 indexed citations
19.
Associates, et al.. (1968). Ipswich draft basic plan : consultants' proposals for the expanded town : a report to the Minister of Housing and Local Government and Ipswich County Borough Council. HMSO eBooks.1 indexed citations
20.
Associates, et al.. (1967). Effective maintenance management : organization, motivation, and control in industrial maintenance. McGraw-Hill eBooks.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.