Ashton Hawk
Impact in
- Strategy and Management top 5%
- Innovation and Knowledge Management
- International Business and FDI
- Business Strategy and Innovation
- Accounting top 10%
- Corporate Finance and Governance
Papers in
-
- Innovation and Knowledge Management 5
- Business Strategy and Innovation 3
- Finance 7
- Capital Investment and Risk Analysis 7
- Co-authors
- Gonçalo Pacheco‐de‐Almeida (8 shared papers)Bernard Yeung (4 shared papers)Juan Alcácer (2 shared papers)Wilbur Chung (2 shared papers)Jay B. Barney (1 shared paper)Eric A. Fong (1 shared paper)Jeffrey J. Reuer (4 shared papers)Marcus M. Larsen (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Strategic Management Journal (4 papers)Strategy Science (2 papers)Academy of Management Journal (1 paper)California Management Review (1 paper)Strategic Organization (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceSingapore
In The Last Decade
Ashton Hawk
13 papers receiving 261 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Strategy and Management 185
- Accounting 58
- Management of Technology and Innovation 35
- Business and International Management 9
- Management Science and Operations Research 50
Countries citing papers authored by Ashton Hawk
This map shows the geographic impact of Ashton Hawk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ashton Hawk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ashton Hawk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ashton Hawk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ashton Hawk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ashton Hawk. The network helps show where Ashton Hawk may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Ashton Hawk, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2013 | 86 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 41 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 39 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 31 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 31 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2008 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2023 | 2 |
About Ashton Hawk
Ashton Hawk is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Finance, Economics and Econometrics, Accounting and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 13 papers that have together received 268 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Capital Investment and Risk Analysis (7 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (5 papers), Business Strategy and Innovation (3 papers), Private Equity and Venture Capital (3 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (2 papers), Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting (2 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (2 papers) and Market Dynamics and Volatility (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (185 citations), Accounting (58 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (35 citations), Business and International Management (9 citations) and Management Science and Operations Research (50 citations). Ashton Hawk has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Gonçalo Pacheco‐de‐Almeida, Bernard Yeung, Juan Alcácer, Wilbur Chung, Jay B. Barney, Eric A. Fong, Jeffrey J. Reuer, Marcus M. Larsen, Jan-Michael Roß and Michael J. Leiblein. Their work appears in journals such as Strategic Management Journal, Strategy Science, Academy of Management Journal, California Management Review and Strategic Organization.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.