Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Transforming the Public Sector Into an Arena for Co-Creation: Barriers, Drivers, Benefits, and Ways Forward
2016369 citationsJacob Torfing, Eva Sørensen et al.Administration & Societyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Asbjørn Roiseland
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Asbjørn Roiseland's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Asbjørn Roiseland with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Asbjørn Roiseland more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Asbjørn Roiseland
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Asbjørn Roiseland. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Asbjørn Roiseland. The network helps show where Asbjørn Roiseland may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Asbjørn Roiseland
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Asbjørn Roiseland.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Asbjørn Roiseland based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Asbjørn Roiseland. Asbjørn Roiseland is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Pierre, Jon, et al.. (2017). Participation or Satisfaction? Examining Determinants of Trust in Local Government. BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)). 21(3). 3–16.7 indexed citations
Roiseland, Asbjørn. (2016). User Choice – Blessing or Curse? Exploring Democratic Participation in Swedish and Norwegian Local Governments. BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)). 20(4). 27–51.4 indexed citations
9.
Torfing, Jacob, Eva Sørensen, & Asbjørn Roiseland. (2016). Transforming the Public Sector Into an Arena for Co-Creation: Barriers, Drivers, Benefits, and Ways Forward. Administration & Society. 51(5). 795–825.369 indexed citations breakdown →
10.
Roiseland, Asbjørn. (2016). User Choice – Blessing or Curse?. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration. 20(4). 27–51.7 indexed citations
Torfing, Jacob, Anders Lidström, & Asbjørn Roiseland. (2015). The Scandinavian Regional Model: Accounting for the shift from convergence to divergence. BIBSYS Brage (BIBSYS (Norway)). 19(4). 7–28.10 indexed citations
13.
Torfing, Jacob, Anders Lidström, & Asbjørn Roiseland. (2015). Scandinavian Regional Model:. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration. 19(4). 7–28.6 indexed citations
14.
Roiseland, Asbjørn, Eva Sørensen, Hege Hofstad, & Anders Lidström. (2015). Taking stock of regional governance in the Nordic countries. Duo Research Archive (University of Oslo). 19(4). 3–6.
15.
Roiseland, Asbjørn, Hege Hofstad, Anders Lidström, & Eva Sørensen. (2015). Taking Stock of Regional Governance. Scandinavian Journal of Public Administration. 19(4). 3–6.11 indexed citations
Vabo, Signy Irene & Asbjørn Roiseland. (2008). Kommunalt selvstyre eller samstyring?. Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning. 49(3). 409–418.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.