Arthur Wingfield

15.5k total citations · 2 hit papers
181 papers, 10.8k citations indexed

About

Arthur Wingfield is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Arthur Wingfield has authored 181 papers receiving a total of 10.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 147 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 68 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 58 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Arthur Wingfield's work include Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (74 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (58 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (37 papers). Arthur Wingfield is often cited by papers focused on Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (74 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (58 papers) and Reading and Literacy Development (37 papers). Arthur Wingfield collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Arthur Wingfield's co-authors include Patricia A. Tun, Jonathan E. Peelle, R. C. Oldfield, Sandra L. McCoy, Murray Grossman, Elizabeth A.L. Stine, Harold Goodglass, Elizabeth L. Stine, Michael J. Kahana and Vanessa Troiani and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Journal of Neuroscience.

In The Last Decade

Arthur Wingfield

177 papers receiving 10.3k citations

Hit Papers

Hearing Impa... 1965 2026 1985 2005 2016 1965 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Arthur Wingfield United States 55 9.3k 3.3k 3.1k 2.5k 1.4k 181 10.8k
Jer­ker Rönnberg Sweden 48 6.5k 0.7× 2.2k 0.7× 2.4k 0.8× 3.0k 1.2× 1.2k 0.9× 272 7.9k
Meredyth Daneman Canada 35 7.0k 0.8× 3.5k 1.1× 5.4k 1.7× 1.2k 0.5× 469 0.3× 70 10.8k
M. Kathleen Pichora‐Fuller Canada 44 7.3k 0.8× 2.2k 0.7× 1.0k 0.3× 4.2k 1.6× 2.2k 1.6× 177 8.5k
Claude Alain Canada 61 11.0k 1.2× 4.2k 1.3× 810 0.3× 939 0.4× 886 0.6× 267 12.0k
Jonathan E. Peelle United States 38 4.9k 0.5× 1.8k 0.5× 947 0.3× 869 0.3× 792 0.6× 105 5.9k
Thomas Lunner Denmark 44 6.7k 0.7× 1.4k 0.4× 1.2k 0.4× 3.9k 1.6× 1.6k 1.1× 173 7.6k
Sophia E. Kramer Netherlands 49 7.0k 0.8× 1.2k 0.4× 1.5k 0.5× 4.5k 1.8× 2.4k 1.7× 187 8.3k
Erich Schröger Germany 71 15.6k 1.7× 6.7k 2.0× 1.1k 0.3× 323 0.1× 695 0.5× 288 16.6k
Mari Tervaniemi Finland 64 11.8k 1.3× 4.2k 1.3× 1.2k 0.4× 445 0.2× 559 0.4× 238 13.4k
Stefan Koelsch Germany 68 12.7k 1.4× 4.3k 1.3× 1.2k 0.4× 222 0.1× 415 0.3× 167 14.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Arthur Wingfield

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Arthur Wingfield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Arthur Wingfield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arthur Wingfield more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Arthur Wingfield

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Arthur Wingfield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Arthur Wingfield. The network helps show where Arthur Wingfield may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Arthur Wingfield

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Arthur Wingfield. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Arthur Wingfield based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Arthur Wingfield. Arthur Wingfield is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wingfield, Arthur, et al.. (2025). The “inverted-U” of cognitive effort across speech rates holds for simple but not complex sentence structures. Frontiers in Psychology. 16. 1685938–1685938.
2.
Mattys, Sven L., et al.. (2025). Reconceptualizing cognitive listening. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 1 indexed citations
3.
Dugan, G., et al.. (2025). A drift–diffusion decomposition of conditions that influence shallow (“good enough”) processing of heard sentences. Memory & Cognition. 54(1). 244–257. 1 indexed citations
4.
Svirsky, Mario A., et al.. (2024). Communication Under Sharply Degraded Auditory Input and the “2-Sentence” Problem. Ear and Hearing. 45(4). 1045–1058. 3 indexed citations
6.
Wingfield, Arthur, et al.. (2021). Age-Related Differences in the Online Processing of Spoken Semantic Context and the Effect of Semantic Competition: Evidence From Eye Gaze. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research. 64(2). 315–327. 14 indexed citations
7.
Lee, Yune Sang, et al.. (2018). Differences in Hearing Acuity among “Normal-Hearing” Young Adults Modulate the Neural Basis for Speech Comprehension. eNeuro. 5(3). ENEURO.0263–17.2018. 11 indexed citations
8.
Wingfield, Arthur, et al.. (2016). Multiple Solutions to the Same Problem: Utilization of Plausibility and Syntax in Sentence Comprehension by Older Adults with Impaired Hearing. Frontiers in Psychology. 7. 789–789. 15 indexed citations
9.
Wingfield, Arthur, et al.. (2009). Hearing Loss and Cognitive Effort in Older Adults' Report Accuracy for Verbal Materials. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 20(2). 147–154. 57 indexed citations
10.
Zaromb, Franklin M., Marc W. Howard, Emily Dolan, et al.. (2006). Temporal associations and prior-list intrusions in free recall.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 32(4). 792–804. 66 indexed citations
11.
Peelle, Jonathan E. & Arthur Wingfield. (2005). Dissociations in Perceptual Learning Revealed by Adult Age Differences in Adaptation to Time-Compressed Speech.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance. 31(6). 1315–1330. 114 indexed citations
12.
Wingfield, Arthur, et al.. (2005). Variable solutions to the same problem: Aberrant practice effects in object naming by three aphasic patients. Brain and Language. 97(3). 351–356. 6 indexed citations
13.
Lindfield, Kimberly C., Arthur Wingfield, & Harold Goodglass. (1999). The Role of Prosody in the Mental Lexicon. Brain and Language. 68(1-2). 312–317. 27 indexed citations
14.
Wingfield, Arthur, Kimberly C. Lindfield, & Michael J. Kahana. (1998). Adult age differences in the temporal characteristics of category free recall.. Psychology and Aging. 13(2). 256–266. 33 indexed citations
15.
Goodglass, Harold & Arthur Wingfield. (1997). Anomia : neuroanatomical and cognitive correlates. Digital Commons - RU (Rockefeller University). 169 indexed citations
16.
Wingfield, Arthur, Elizabeth A.L. Stine, Cindy J. Lahar, & John Aberdeen. (1988). Does the capacity of working memory change with age?. Experimental Aging Research. 14(2). 103–107. 210 indexed citations
17.
Stine, Elizabeth L. & Arthur Wingfield. (1987). Process and strategy in memory for speech among younger and older adults.. Psychology and Aging. 2(3). 272–279. 117 indexed citations
18.
Goodglass, Harold, et al.. (1986). Category Specific Dissociations in Naming and Recognition by Aphasic Patients. Cortex. 22(1). 87–102. 62 indexed citations
19.
Wingfield, Arthur. (1979). Human learning and memory : an introduction. Harper & Row eBooks. 14 indexed citations
20.
Wingfield, Arthur, et al.. (1971). Syntactic Structure and Acoustic Pattern in Speech Perception.. Perception & Psychophysics. 31 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026