Arthur E. Finch

1.1k total citations
8 papers, 762 citations indexed

About

Arthur E. Finch is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Arthur E. Finch has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 762 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Clinical Psychology, 3 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 3 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Arthur E. Finch's work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (3 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers). Arthur E. Finch is often cited by papers focused on Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (3 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers). Arthur E. Finch collaborates with scholars based in United States and Germany. Arthur E. Finch's co-authors include Michael J. Lambert, Nathan B. Hansen, Lynn D. Johnson, John C. Okiishi, David A. Vermeersch, Jason L. Whipple and G. S. Brown and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Journal of Clinical Psychology and Professional Psychology Research and Practice.

In The Last Decade

Arthur E. Finch

8 papers receiving 686 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Arthur E. Finch United States	6	617	227	188	133	121	8	762
Karstin Slade United States	7	628 1.0×	287 1.3×	168 0.9×	153 1.2×	133 1.1×	7	823
Wendy Wade United States	6	496 0.8×	161 0.7×	229 1.2×	83 0.6×	116 1.0×	9	680
Dennis Greenberger United States	5	394 0.6×	168 0.7×	149 0.8×	78 0.6×	85 0.7×	6	602
Tomasz P. Andrusyna United States	8	523 0.8×	194 0.9×	182 1.0×	63 0.5×	87 0.7×	12	668
Michael S. Maling United States	5	634 1.0×	273 1.2×	217 1.2×	111 0.8×	147 1.2×	6	800
Aaron D. Krasnow United States	6	621 1.0×	231 1.0×	160 0.9×	76 0.6×	103 0.9×	6	844
Elspeth Twigg United Kingdom	10	542 0.9×	260 1.1×	105 0.6×	110 0.8×	76 0.6×	11	741
John C. Okiishi United States	9	587 1.0×	309 1.4×	90 0.5×	66 0.5×	90 0.7×	13	709
Anton Hafkenscheid Netherlands	14	565 0.9×	245 1.1×	161 0.9×	188 1.4×	68 0.6×	53	784
Derek Hatfield United States	7	414 0.7×	199 0.9×	108 0.6×	120 0.9×	80 0.7×	10	602

Countries citing papers authored by Arthur E. Finch

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Arthur E. Finch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Arthur E. Finch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arthur E. Finch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Arthur E. Finch

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Arthur E. Finch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Arthur E. Finch. The network helps show where Arthur E. Finch may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Arthur E. Finch

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Arthur E. Finch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Arthur E. Finch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Arthur E. Finch. Arthur E. Finch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

1.

Lambert, Michael J., et al.. (2002). Comparison of empirically‐derived and rationally‐derived methods for identifying patients at risk for treatment failure. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. 9(3). 149–164. 101 indexed citations

2.

Lambert, Michael J., Nathan B. Hansen, & Arthur E. Finch. (2001). Patient-focused research: Using patient outcome data to enhance treatment effects.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 69(2). 159–172. 400 indexed citations

3.

Finch, Arthur E., et al.. (2001). Psychotherapy quality control: the statistical generation of expected recovery curves for integration into an early warning system. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. 8(4). 231–242. 1 indexed citations

4.

Finch, Arthur E., et al.. (2001). Psychotherapy quality control: the statistical generation of expected recovery curves for integration into an early warning system. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. 8(4). 231–242. 111 indexed citations

5.

Lambert, Michael J., Nathan B. Hansen, & Arthur E. Finch. (2001). Patient-focused research: Using patient outcome data to enhance treatment effects.. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 69(2). 159–172. 41 indexed citations

6.

Finch, Arthur E., Michael J. Lambert, & G. S. Brown. (2000). Attacking anxiety: A naturalistic study of a multimedia self-help program. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 56(1). 11–21. 5 indexed citations

7.

Lambert, Michael J., John C. Okiishi, Arthur E. Finch, & Lynn D. Johnson. (1998). Outcome assessment: From conceptualization to implementation.. Professional Psychology Research and Practice. 29(1). 63–70. 98 indexed citations

8.

Lambert, Michael J., John C. Okiishi, Arthur E. Finch, & Lynn D. Johnson. (1998). Outcome assessment: From conceptualization to implementation.. Professional Psychology Research and Practice. 29(1). 63–70. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact