Arnaud Pocheville
- Genetics
- Molecular Biology
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- History and Philosophy of Science top 2%
- Co-authors
- Étienne DanchinMaël MontévilGiuseppe LongoMatteo MossioPaul E. GriffithsGuillaume IsabelSabine NöbelKarola Stotz
- Topics
- Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (8 papers)Philosophy and History of Science (7 papers)Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Arnaud Pocheville
24 papers receiving 548 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Genetics 172
- Molecular Biology 170
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 128
- Sociology and Political Science 106
- History and Philosophy of Science 95
Countries citing papers authored by Arnaud Pocheville
This map shows the geographic impact of Arnaud Pocheville's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Arnaud Pocheville with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arnaud Pocheville more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Arnaud Pocheville
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Arnaud Pocheville. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Arnaud Pocheville. The network helps show where Arnaud Pocheville may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Arnaud Pocheville
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Arnaud Pocheville. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Arnaud Pocheville based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Arnaud Pocheville. Arnaud Pocheville is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 126 | |
| 5 | 70 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 56 | |
| 10 | 39 | |
| 11 | From the century of the genome to the century of the organism: New theoretical approaches | 8 |
| 12 | 38 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 67 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 31 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 26 | |
| 19 | 18 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About Arnaud Pocheville
Arnaud Pocheville is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Genetics and Astronomy and Astrophysics, having authored 24 papers that have together received 565 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (8 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (7 papers) and Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (95 citations), Aging (16 citations) and Developmental Biology (15 citations). Arnaud Pocheville has collaborated with scholars based in France, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Étienne Danchin, Maël Montévil, Giuseppe Longo, Matteo Mossio, Paul E. Griffiths, Guillaume Isabel, Sabine Nöbel, Karola Stotz, Olivier Rey and Simon Blanchet. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and The Journal of Physiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.