Nicolas Châline

1.5k total citations
52 papers, 1.1k citations indexed

About

Nicolas Châline is a scholar working on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Genetics and Insect Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Nicolas Châline has authored 52 papers receiving a total of 1.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 50 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, 48 papers in Genetics and 19 papers in Insect Science. Recurrent topics in Nicolas Châline's work include Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (47 papers), Plant and animal studies (46 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (23 papers). Nicolas Châline is often cited by papers focused on Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (47 papers), Plant and animal studies (46 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (23 papers). Nicolas Châline collaborates with scholars based in France, Brazil and United Kingdom. Nicolas Châline's co-authors include Pierre Jaisson, Terry Burke, Francis L. W. Ratnieks, Stephen J. Martin, Gwenaël Kaminski, Duncan E. Jackson, Francis L. W. Ratnieks, Jean‐Christophe Sandoz, Serafino Teseo and Daniel J. C. Kronauer and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, PLoS ONE and Current Biology.

In The Last Decade

Nicolas Châline

50 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Nicolas Châline France 19 980 903 532 139 77 52 1.1k
Jennifer M. Jandt United States 15 973 1.0× 905 1.0× 482 0.9× 54 0.4× 71 0.9× 35 1.1k
Eisuke Hasegawa Japan 21 876 0.9× 887 1.0× 549 1.0× 90 0.6× 40 0.5× 83 1.1k
Thibaud Monnin France 19 1.5k 1.5× 1.5k 1.6× 796 1.5× 51 0.4× 86 1.1× 46 1.6k
Yoshitaka Kamimura Japan 22 906 0.9× 716 0.8× 306 0.6× 127 0.9× 59 0.8× 71 1.1k
Zenobia Lewis United Kingdom 20 628 0.6× 489 0.5× 405 0.8× 61 0.4× 47 0.6× 41 974
Perttu Seppä Finland 27 1.6k 1.6× 1.6k 1.7× 486 0.9× 158 1.1× 24 0.3× 58 1.8k
Ellen van Wilgenburg Australia 12 541 0.6× 529 0.6× 362 0.7× 53 0.4× 65 0.8× 20 736
Dhruba Naug United States 20 1.5k 1.5× 1.4k 1.6× 1.3k 2.5× 91 0.7× 58 0.8× 41 1.8k
Jean-Paul Lachaud France 21 1.1k 1.1× 1.0k 1.1× 631 1.2× 67 0.5× 103 1.3× 69 1.2k
Norman F. Carlin United States 18 1.1k 1.1× 1.1k 1.2× 487 0.9× 39 0.3× 110 1.4× 25 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Nicolas Châline

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicolas Châline's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicolas Châline with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicolas Châline more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicolas Châline

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicolas Châline. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicolas Châline. The network helps show where Nicolas Châline may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicolas Châline

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicolas Châline. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicolas Châline based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicolas Châline. Nicolas Châline is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
2.
Teseo, Serafino, et al.. (2024). Competition through ritualized aggressive interactions between sympatric colonies in solitary foraging neotropical ants. Die Naturwissenschaften. 111(1). 4–4. 2 indexed citations
3.
Teseo, Serafino, et al.. (2023). Composition and inter-species relationships within ant communities across differentially anthropized urban environments: a case study. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science. 44(1). 129–138. 1 indexed citations
4.
Teseo, Serafino, et al.. (2022). Temporary prey storage along swarm columns of army ants: an adaptive strategy for successful raiding?. Biology Letters. 18(2). 1 indexed citations
5.
Féron, Christophe, et al.. (2021). Is there a bias in spatial maze judgment bias tests? Individual differences in subjects’ novelty response can affect test results. Behavioural Brain Research. 407. 113262–113262. 11 indexed citations
6.
Japyassú, Hilton F., et al.. (2018). From Classificatory to Quantitative Concepts in the Study of Sociality in Animals: An Epistemological View. Biological Theory. 13(3). 180–189. 1 indexed citations
7.
Leborgne, Raymond, et al.. (2016). Time till death affects spider mobility and web-building behavior during web construction in an orb-web spider. Current Zoology. 62(2). 123–130. 4 indexed citations
8.
Yagound, Boris, et al.. (2015). Fertility Signaling and Partitioning of Reproduction in the Ant Neoponera apicalis. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 41(6). 557–566. 3 indexed citations
9.
Teseo, Serafino, Daniel J. C. Kronauer, Abraham Hefetz, et al.. (2014). Genetic Distance and Age Affect the Cuticular Chemical Profiles of the Clonal Ant Cerapachys biroi. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 40(5). 429–438. 4 indexed citations
10.
Teseo, Serafino, Nicolas Châline, Pierre Jaisson, & Daniel J. C. Kronauer. (2014). Epistasis between adults and larvae underlies caste fate and fitness in a clonal ant. Nature Communications. 5(1). 3363–3363. 27 indexed citations
11.
Yagound, Boris, et al.. (2013). Drifting behaviour as an alternative reproductive strategy for social insect workers. Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences. 280(1771). 20131888–20131888. 22 indexed citations
12.
Châline, Nicolas, et al.. (2013). Specific recognition of reproductive parasite workers by nest-entrance guards in the bumble bee Bombus terrestris. Frontiers in Zoology. 10(1). 74–74. 9 indexed citations
13.
Delattre, Olivier, et al.. (2012). Do host species evolve a specific response to slave-making ants?. Frontiers in Zoology. 9(1). 38–38. 8 indexed citations
14.
Yagound, Boris, et al.. (2012). Social Context and Reproductive Potential Affect Worker Reproductive Decisions in a Eusocial Insect. PLoS ONE. 7(12). e52217–e52217. 18 indexed citations
15.
Lefebvre, Thomas, et al.. (2008). From speciation to introgressive hybridization: the phylogeographic structure of an island subspecies of termite, Reticulitermes lucifugus corsicus. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 8(1). 38–38. 32 indexed citations
16.
Leniaud, Laurianne, et al.. (2007). Development of experimentally orphaned termite worker colonies of two Reticulitermes species (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Sociobiology. 50(3). 1015–1034. 16 indexed citations
17.
Kaminski, Gwenaël, et al.. (2007). Individual Experience Alone Can Generate Lasting Division of Labor in Ants. Current Biology. 17(15). 1308–1312. 156 indexed citations
18.
Martin, Stephen J., et al.. (2005). Searching for the egg-marking signal in honeybees. Figshare. 2(1). 16 indexed citations
19.
Châline, Nicolas, et al.. (2005). Learning and Discrimination of Individual Cuticular Hydrocarbons by Honeybees (Apis mellifera). Chemical Senses. 30(4). 327–335. 98 indexed citations
20.
Châline, Nicolas, Francis L. W. Ratnieks, & Terry Burke. (2002). Anarchy in the UK: Detailed genetic analysis of worker reproduction in a naturally occurring British anarchistic honeybee,Apis mellifera, colony using DNA microsatellites. Molecular Ecology. 11(9). 1795–1803. 37 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jennifer M. Jandt Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Eisuke Hasegawa Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Thibaud Monnin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Yoshitaka Kamimura Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Zenobia Lewis Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Perttu Seppä Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ellen van Wilgenburg Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Dhruba Naug Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jean-Paul Lachaud Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Norman F. Carlin
Rankless by CCL
2026