Pierrick Bourrat

1.4k citations
61 papers · 831 indexed · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Pierrick Bourrat

57 papers receiving 796 citations

Peers

Pierrick Bourrat
Comparison fields: 5 of 102
  • History and Philosophy of Science 249
  • Genetics 380
  • Sociology and Political Science 504
  • Aging 20
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 101
Replace Maurizio Meloni with:
Maurizio Meloni Australia
Ron Amundson United States
Iver Mysterud Norway
Jason Scott Robert United States
Ellen Clarke United Kingdom
Garland E. Allen United States
Gregory Cochran United States
Russell Powell United States
Philippe Huneman France
Jonathan Michael Kaplan United States
Pierrick Bourrat relative to Maurizio Meloni Australia Maurizio Meloni's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Maurizio Meloni · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Pierrick Bourrat

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pierrick Bourrat's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pierrick Bourrat with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pierrick Bourrat more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pierrick Bourrat

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pierrick Bourrat. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pierrick Bourrat. The network helps show where Pierrick Bourrat may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Pierrick Bourrat, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Pierrick Bourrat Line = papers co-authored together Pierrick Bourrat links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 61 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010121
2 202062
3 201143
4 201339
5 201738
6 201432
7 201829
8 201629
9 201626
10 201425
11 201523
12 202220
13 201719
14 202118
15 201617
16 201916
17 201815
18 201515
19 202215
20 201915

About Pierrick Bourrat

Pierrick Bourrat is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Genetics, History and Philosophy of Science, Molecular Biology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 61 papers that have together received 831 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (39 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (31 papers), Evolution and Genetic Dynamics (27 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (5 papers), Genetic Associations and Epidemiology (5 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (3 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers) and Plant and animal studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (249 citations), Genetics (380 citations), Sociology and Political Science (504 citations), Aging (20 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (101 citations). Pierrick Bourrat has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Germany and France. Frequent co-authors include Quentin D. Atkinson, Paul B. Rainey, Paul E. Griffiths, Andrew J. Black, Ryan McKay, Nicolas Baumard, Eva Jablonka, Mathieu Charbonneau, Guilhem Doulcier and Katrin Hammerschmidt. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy of Science, Biology & Philosophy, The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Biological Theory and Synthese.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact