Arielle Tambini
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Lila DavachiNicholas KetzGalit YovelTalia BrandmanMark D’EspositoElizabeth A. PhelpsDerek Evan NeeUlrike Rimmele
- Topics
- Memory and Neural Mechanisms (11 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (10 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaFrance
In The Last Decade
Arielle Tambini
19 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.4k
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 239
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 232
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 98
- Psychiatry and Mental health 90
Countries citing papers authored by Arielle Tambini
This map shows the geographic impact of Arielle Tambini's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Arielle Tambini with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Arielle Tambini more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Arielle Tambini
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Arielle Tambini. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Arielle Tambini. The network helps show where Arielle Tambini may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Arielle Tambini
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Arielle Tambini. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Arielle Tambini based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Arielle Tambini. Arielle Tambini is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 25 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 26 | |
| 8 | 114 | |
| 9 | 86 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 62 | |
| 12 | 34 | |
| 13 | 68 | |
| 14 | 100 | |
| 15 | 161 | |
| 16 | 438 | |
| 17 | 119 | |
| 18 | 52 | |
| 19 | 161 |
About Arielle Tambini
Arielle Tambini is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Behavioral Neuroscience and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, having authored 19 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Memory and Neural Mechanisms (11 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (10 papers) and Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.4k citations), Behavioral Neuroscience (78 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (239 citations). Arielle Tambini has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and France. Frequent co-authors include Lila Davachi, Nicholas Ketz, Galit Yovel, Talia Brandman, Mark D’Esposito, Elizabeth A. Phelps, Derek Evan Nee, Ulrike Rimmele, Pamela D. Butler and Daniel C. Javitt. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Communications and Neuron.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.