Regina C. Lapate
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Richard J. DavidsonCarien M. van ReekumStacey M. SchaeferCarol D. RyffCatherine J. NorrisAaron S. HellerBas RokersLawrence L. Greischar
- Topics
- Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (8 papers)Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (7 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Regina C. Lapate
24 papers receiving 746 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Cognitive Neuroscience 304
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 258
- Social Psychology 252
- Clinical Psychology 248
- Applied Psychology 103
Countries citing papers authored by Regina C. Lapate
This map shows the geographic impact of Regina C. Lapate's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Regina C. Lapate with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Regina C. Lapate more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Regina C. Lapate
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Regina C. Lapate. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Regina C. Lapate. The network helps show where Regina C. Lapate may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Regina C. Lapate
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Regina C. Lapate. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Regina C. Lapate based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Regina C. Lapate. Regina C. Lapate is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 15 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 56 | |
| 13 | 49 | |
| 14 | 61 | |
| 15 | 88 | |
| 16 | 163 | |
| 17 | 51 | |
| 18 | 74 | |
| 19 | 46 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About Regina C. Lapate
Regina C. Lapate is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Behavioral Neuroscience and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 27 papers that have together received 782 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (8 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (7 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (103 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (258 citations) and Behavioral Neuroscience (69 citations). Regina C. Lapate has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Richard J. Davidson, Carien M. van Reekum, Stacey M. Schaefer, Carol D. Ryff, Catherine J. Norris, Aaron S. Heller, Bas Rokers, Lawrence L. Greischar, Jennifer Morozink Boylan and Barry Radler. Their work appears in journals such as Nature Communications, Journal of Neuroscience and PLoS ONE.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.