Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
When and how to develop domain-specific languages
2005951 citationsMarjan Mernik, Jan Heering et al.ACM Computing Surveysprofile →
Citations per year, relative to Anthony M. Sloane Anthony M. Sloane (= 1×)
peers
Juha‐Pekka Tolvanen
Countries citing papers authored by Anthony M. Sloane
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Anthony M. Sloane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anthony M. Sloane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anthony M. Sloane more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anthony M. Sloane
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anthony M. Sloane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anthony M. Sloane. The network helps show where Anthony M. Sloane may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anthony M. Sloane
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anthony M. Sloane.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anthony M. Sloane based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Anthony M. Sloane. Anthony M. Sloane is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Sloane, Anthony M. & Suzana Andova. (2012). Proceedings of the Twelfth Workshop on Language Descriptions, Tools, and Applications.2 indexed citations
6.
Sloane, Anthony M. & Uwe Aßmann. (2011). Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Software Language Engineering.11 indexed citations
7.
Sloane, Anthony M., Lennart C.L. Kats, & Eelco Visser. (2011). A pure embedding of attribute grammars. Science of Computer Programming. 78(10). 1752–1769.16 indexed citations
8.
Sloane, Anthony M., et al.. (2005). A pattern enforcing compiler (PEC) for Java: using the compiler. 69–78.6 indexed citations
9.
Mernik, Marjan, Jan Heering, & Anthony M. Sloane. (2005). When and how to develop domain-specific languages. ACM Computing Surveys. 37(4). 316–344.951 indexed citations breakdown →
Pisan, Yusuf, et al.. (2003). Submit! a web-based system for automatic program critiquing. Australasian Computing Education Conference. 59–68.15 indexed citations
12.
Mernik, Marjan, Jan Heering, & Anthony M. Sloane. (2003). When and how to develop domain-specific languages. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 1–36.7 indexed citations
13.
Sloane, Anthony M.. (2003). Eli: translator construction made easy.2 indexed citations
14.
Pisan, Yusuf, et al.. (2003). A Web-based System for Automatic Program Critiquing.. 59–68.1 indexed citations
15.
Sloane, Anthony M., et al.. (1996). Beyond traditional program slicing. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes. 21(3). 180–186.22 indexed citations
Zigurs, Ilze, E. Vance Wilson, Anthony M. Sloane, René Reitsma, & Clayton Lewis. (1994). Simulation Models and Group Negotiation: Problems of Task Understanding and Computer Support. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 306–315.7 indexed citations
Grunwald, Dirk, et al.. (1993). A Testbed for Studying Parallel Programs and Parallel Execution Architectures. 95–106.5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.