Anthony Graham‐White

661 citations
26 papers · 253 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Anthony Graham‐White

21 papers receiving 153 citations

Peers

Anthony Graham‐White
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 49
  • Music 27
  • Museology 16
  • Anthropology 40
  • Literature and Literary Theory 32
Replace B. F. Dick with:
B. F. Dick
Liliane Weissberg United States
Peter Hawkins United Kingdom
Judith Hamera United States
Laurence Senelick United States
Betsy Draine
John Whittier Treat United States
Rustom Bharucha India
Antony Easthope United States
Orhan Pamuk United States
Anthony Graham‐White relative to B. F. Dick B. F. Dick's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
B. F. Dick · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Anthony Graham‐White

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anthony Graham‐White's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anthony Graham‐White with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anthony Graham‐White more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anthony Graham‐White

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anthony Graham‐White. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anthony Graham‐White. The network helps show where Anthony Graham‐White may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Anthony Graham‐White, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Anthony Graham‐White Line = papers co-authored together Anthony Graham‐White links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1975117
2 197724
3 197017
4 197413
5 198213
6 197512
7 197810
8 19766
9 19706
10 19894
11 19764
12 19824
13 19973
14 19762
15 19762
16 19762
17 19762
18 19832
19 19732
20 19792

About Anthony Graham‐White

Anthony Graham‐White is a scholar working on Visual Arts and Performing Arts, Literature and Literary Theory, Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology and History, having authored 26 papers that have together received 253 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theatre and Performance Studies (7 papers), Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism (4 papers), African studies and sociopolitical issues (3 papers), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (2 papers), Postcolonial and Cultural Literary Studies (2 papers), African history and culture studies (2 papers), Theater, Performance, and Music History (1 paper) and Cultural Industries and Urban Development (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Visual Arts and Performing Arts (49 citations), Music (27 citations), Museology (16 citations), Anthropology (40 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (32 citations). Anthony Graham‐White has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Victor Turner, John Gassner, John Povey, Martin Banham, Clive Wake, Bert O. States, James Gibbs, N. F. Blake, Keir Elam and Terence Hawkes. Their work appears in journals such as Theatre Journal, The Modern Language Review, African Arts, Text and Performance Quarterly and Shakespeare Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact