Ans Luyben

799 total citations
33 papers, 526 citations indexed

About

Ans Luyben is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Ans Luyben has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 526 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 16 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and 9 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Ans Luyben's work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (22 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (13 papers) and Global Health Workforce Issues (6 papers). Ans Luyben is often cited by papers focused on Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (22 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (13 papers) and Global Health Workforce Issues (6 papers). Ans Luyben collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Belgium and Switzerland. Ans Luyben's co-authors include Valerie Fleming, Patricia Gillen, Marlene Sinclair, Cecily Begley, George Kernohan, Joeri Vermeulen, Rhona O’Connell, Mary K. Barger, Lucy Frith and Kuldip Bharj and has published in prestigious journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Journal of Advanced Nursing and BMC Health Services Research.

In The Last Decade

Ans Luyben

31 papers receiving 493 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ans Luyben United Kingdom 12 207 192 180 114 114 33 526
Ravani Duggan Australia 15 209 1.0× 169 0.9× 133 0.7× 115 1.0× 138 1.2× 30 542
Lesley Page United Kingdom 11 345 1.7× 132 0.7× 151 0.8× 71 0.6× 156 1.4× 62 550
Sadie Geraghty Australia 12 144 0.7× 152 0.8× 126 0.7× 66 0.6× 130 1.1× 75 430
Andrea Gilkison New Zealand 13 326 1.6× 208 1.1× 114 0.6× 59 0.5× 128 1.1× 44 602
Ruth Deery United Kingdom 12 140 0.7× 155 0.8× 60 0.3× 68 0.6× 63 0.6× 36 373
Rosemary Mander United Kingdom 16 327 1.6× 141 0.7× 221 1.2× 83 0.7× 210 1.8× 80 678
Mia Barimani Sweden 13 199 1.0× 132 0.7× 161 0.9× 64 0.6× 264 2.3× 36 511
Lesley Kuliukas Australia 14 390 1.9× 95 0.5× 163 0.9× 47 0.4× 213 1.9× 34 611
Sharareh Akhavan Sweden 13 75 0.4× 197 1.0× 65 0.4× 112 1.0× 75 0.7× 30 455
Joanne Gray Australia 15 189 0.9× 162 0.8× 76 0.4× 70 0.6× 94 0.8× 32 535

Countries citing papers authored by Ans Luyben

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ans Luyben's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ans Luyben with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ans Luyben more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ans Luyben

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ans Luyben. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ans Luyben. The network helps show where Ans Luyben may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ans Luyben

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ans Luyben. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ans Luyben based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ans Luyben. Ans Luyben is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Luyben, Ans, et al.. (2025). Enhancing collaboration between midwives and obstetricians: A qualitative content analysis study. Women and Birth. 38(4). 101929–101929.
2.
Vermeulen, Joeri, Ronald Buyl, Ans Luyben, et al.. (2024). How to promote midwives' recognition and professional autonomy? A document analysis study. Midwifery. 138. 104138–104138. 4 indexed citations
3.
Luyben, Ans, et al.. (2024). Predicting collaborative practice between midwives and obstetricians: A regression analysis. European Journal of Midwifery. 8(September). 1–10. 2 indexed citations
4.
Vermeulen, Joeri, Ronald Buyl, Ans Luyben, Valerie Fleming, & Maaike Fobelets. (2023). Key Maternity Care Stakeholders’ Views on Midwives’ Professional Autonomy. Healthcare. 11(9). 1231–1231. 6 indexed citations
5.
Vermeulen, Joeri, Maaike Fobelets, Valerie Fleming, et al.. (2023). How Do Midwives View Their Professional Autonomy, Now and in Future?. Healthcare. 11(12). 1800–1800. 7 indexed citations
6.
Vermeulen, Joeri, Ronald Buyl, Ans Luyben, Valerie Fleming, & Maaike Fobelets. (2022). Defining midwifery autonomy in Belgium: Consensus of a modified Delphi study. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 78(9). 2849–2860. 6 indexed citations
7.
Vermeulen, Joeri, et al.. (2020). The state of professionalisation of midwifery in Belgium: A discussion paper. Women and Birth. 34(1). 7–13. 14 indexed citations
8.
Barger, Mary K., Barbara Hackley, Kuldip Bharj, Ans Luyben, & Joyce Beebe Thompson. (2019). Knowledge and use of the ICM global standards for midwifery education. Midwifery. 79. 102534–102534. 19 indexed citations
9.
Vermeulen, Joeri, Ans Luyben, Rhona O’Connell, et al.. (2019). Failure or progress?: The current state of the professionalisation of midwifery in Europe. European Journal of Midwifery. 3(December). 22–22. 37 indexed citations
10.
11.
Fleming, Valerie, et al.. (2018). Conscientious objection to participation in abortion by midwives and nurses: a systematic review of reasons. BMC Medical Ethics. 19(1). 31–31. 37 indexed citations
12.
Luyben, Ans, Mary K. Barger, Melissa D. Avery, & Debra Bick. (2018). What is next? Midwifery education building partnerships for tomorrow's maternal and neonatal health care. Midwifery. 64. 132–135. 6 indexed citations
13.
Luyben, Ans, Mary K. Barger, Melissa D. Avery, et al.. (2017). Exploring global recognition of quality midwifery education: Vision or fiction?. Women and Birth. 30(3). 184–192. 28 indexed citations
14.
Bharj, Kuldip, Ans Luyben, Melissa D. Avery, et al.. (2016). An agenda for midwifery education: Advancing the state of the world׳s midwifery. Midwifery. 33. 3–6. 48 indexed citations
15.
Fleming, Valerie & Ans Luyben. (2015). Establishing a Master׳s for Europe – A transnational model for higher education. Midwifery. 33. 52–54. 7 indexed citations
16.
Escuriet, Ramón, Joanna White, Katrien Beeckman, et al.. (2015). Assessing the performance of maternity care in Europe: a critical exploration of tools and indicators. BMC Health Services Research. 15(1). 491–491. 32 indexed citations
17.
Luyben, Ans, et al.. (2013). The current state of midwifery and development of midwifery research in four European countries. Midwifery. 29(5). 417–424. 22 indexed citations
18.
Luyben, Ans & Valerie Fleming. (2005). Women's needs from antenatal care in three European countries. Midwifery. 21(3). 212–223. 36 indexed citations
19.
Luyben, Ans, et al.. (2002). Hebammen präferieren vaginale Geburt statt Wunschsektio1. Zeitschrift für Geburtshilfe und Neonatologie. 206(2). 72–74. 4 indexed citations
20.
Luyben, Ans & Mechthild M. Groß. (2001). Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: do Swiss midwives implement evidence into practice?. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 96(2). 179–182. 5 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026