Ruth Deery

37 papers receiving 361 citations

Peers

Ruth Deery
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
  • Research and Theory 13
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 98
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 6
  • General Health Professions 88
  • Public Administration 13
Replace Heather Cahill with:
Heather Cahill United States
Carole Schroeder United States
Brenda L. Cameron Canada
Hatice Başkale Türkiye
Frances Doran Australia
Susan McClennan Reece United States
Kerreen Reiger Australia
Nieli Langer United States
Celeste R. Phillips United States
Gamze Teskereci Türkiye
Ruth Deery relative to Heather Cahill United States Heather Cahill's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Heather Cahill · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ruth Deery

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ruth Deery's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ruth Deery with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ruth Deery more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ruth Deery

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ruth Deery. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ruth Deery. The network helps show where Ruth Deery may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 20 scholars most cited alongside Ruth Deery, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ruth Deery Line = papers co-authored together Ruth Deery links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201759
2 200555
3 199731
4 200824
5
Building our knowledge about emotion work in midwifery: combining and comparing findings from two different research studies
200521
6 201719
7 200218
8 200918
9 201716
10 201715
11 201015
12 200815
13 20189
14 20207
15 19996
16
Tensions and Barriers in Improving Maternity Care: The Story of a Birth Centre
20106
17
Supporting midwife-led care through action research: A tale of mess, muddle and birth balls
20046
18 20166
19 20185
20
Women in the driving seat: birth centre insights.
20074

About Ruth Deery

Ruth Deery is a scholar working on Obstetrics and Gynecology, General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science, Education and Social Psychology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 385 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions (9 papers), Nursing education and management (2 papers), Global Health Workforce Issues (2 papers), Emotional Labor in Professions (2 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (2 papers), Nursing Roles and Practices (2 papers), Global Health and Surgery (1 paper) and Wound Healing and Treatments (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (13 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (98 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (6 citations), General Health Professions (88 citations) and Public Administration (13 citations). Ruth Deery has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Graham Sloan, Jean Rankin, Sharon Wray, Deborah Hughes, Pamela Fisher, Billie Hunter, Pauline Campbell, Helen Cheyne, Alex Pollock and Valerie Bryson. Their work appears in journals such as Midwifery, Women and Birth, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Nurse Education in Practice and Health Care For Women International.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact