Annika Agger

38 papers receiving 515 citations

Peers

Annika Agger
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
  • Public Administration 148
  • Urban Studies 129
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 90
  • Finance 77
  • Political Science and International Relations 121
Replace Andreas Novy with:
Andreas Novy Austria
Laurens de Graaf Netherlands
Ismael Blanco Spain
Michael McQuarrie United States
Andrew Knops United Kingdom
John Pløger Denmark
Luigi Bobbio Italy
Carey Doberstein Canada
Andy Inch United Kingdom
Sue Brownill United Kingdom
Annika Agger relative to Andreas Novy Austria Andreas Novy's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.8×
Andreas Novy · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Annika Agger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Annika Agger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annika Agger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annika Agger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Annika Agger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annika Agger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annika Agger. The network helps show where Annika Agger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Annika Agger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Annika Agger Line = papers co-authored together Annika Agger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200886
2 201669
3 201565
4 201942
5 201740
6 201135
7 200928
8 201524
9 201023
10 202122
11
Forskningsreview om samskabelse
201515
12 201813
13 201711
14 20229
15 20219
16 20229
17 20188
18 20226
19 20166
20
How democratic are networks based on citizen involvement
20075

About Annika Agger

Annika Agger is a scholar working on Public Administration, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Urban Studies and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 43 papers that have together received 561 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Public Policy and Administration Research (15 papers), Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development (7 papers), E-Government and Public Services (7 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (6 papers), Social Media and Politics (5 papers), Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (5 papers), Community Development and Social Impact (4 papers) and Social and Educational Sciences (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (148 citations), Urban Studies (129 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (90 citations), Finance (77 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (121 citations). Annika Agger has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, Netherlands and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Karl Löfgren, Eva Sørensen, Jesper Ole Jensen, Torill Nyseth, Catherine Durose, Merlijn van Hulst, Oliver Escobar, Stephen Jeffares, Laurens de Graaf and Charlotte Demant Klinker. Their work appears in journals such as European Planning Studies, Planning Theory, Scandinavian Political Studies, Cities and Town Planning Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact