Annette Freyberg‐Inan
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Development top 10%
- Gender Studies
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Mihai VargaChristian SchöllDaniel JacobiJennifer Sterling-FolkerLauren WilcoxJozef BátoraMarlies GlasiusJohn Gould
- Topics
- Populism, Right-Wing Movements (5 papers)Social Policy and Reform Studies (4 papers)European Union Policy and Governance (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsGermanyUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Annette Freyberg‐Inan
23 papers receiving 152 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Political Science and International Relations 121
- Sociology and Political Science 74
- Development 18
- Gender Studies 11
- General Health Professions 10
Countries citing papers authored by Annette Freyberg‐Inan
This map shows the geographic impact of Annette Freyberg‐Inan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annette Freyberg‐Inan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annette Freyberg‐Inan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Annette Freyberg‐Inan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annette Freyberg‐Inan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annette Freyberg‐Inan. The network helps show where Annette Freyberg‐Inan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Annette Freyberg‐Inan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Annette Freyberg‐Inan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Annette Freyberg‐Inan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Annette Freyberg‐Inan. Annette Freyberg‐Inan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | The Role of Theory for Knowledge Creation in IR : A Sociable Pluralist Discussion | 1 |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 14 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | Introduction: what way forward for contemporary realism? | 1 |
| 13 | Demokratie okay, aber für alle? Demokratieunzufriedenheit und selektive Demokratie in Mittel- und Osteuropa | 2 |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 18 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 34 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Annette Freyberg‐Inan
Annette Freyberg‐Inan is a scholar working on General Psychology, Political Science and International Relations and Public Administration, having authored 23 papers that have together received 171 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Populism, Right-Wing Movements (5 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (4 papers) and European Union Policy and Governance (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (121 citations), Development (18 citations) and Public Administration (10 citations). Annette Freyberg‐Inan has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Mihai Varga, Christian Schöll, Daniel Jacobi, Jennifer Sterling-Folker, Lauren Wilcox, Jozef Bátora, Marlies Glasius, John Gould, Darshan Vigneswaran and David Karp. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of International Relations, Global Networks and Review of International Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.