Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
What authoritarianism is … and is not:∗ a practice perspective
Citations per year, relative to Marlies Glasius Marlies Glasius (= 1×)
peers
Sharon Erickson Nepstad
Countries citing papers authored by Marlies Glasius
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Marlies Glasius's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marlies Glasius with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marlies Glasius more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marlies Glasius. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marlies Glasius. The network helps show where Marlies Glasius may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marlies Glasius
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marlies Glasius.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marlies Glasius based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Marlies Glasius. Marlies Glasius is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Glasius, Marlies, et al.. (2018). . UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).82 indexed citations
2.
Glasius, Marlies & Marcus Michaelsen. (2018). Illiberal and Authoritarian Practices in the Digital Sphere: Prologue. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 12.5 indexed citations
Ishkanian, Armine, et al.. (2013). Reclaiming democracy in the square? Interpreting the movements of 2011-12. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).8 indexed citations
6.
Glasius, Marlies. (2012). Gramsci’s trenches: civil society as "warfare". International Studies Review. 14(4). 670–673.1 indexed citations
Albrow, Martin, Hakan Seckinelgin, Helmut K. Anheier, et al.. (2011). Global civil society 2011 : globality and the absence of justice. Palgrave Macmillan eBooks.6 indexed citations
9.
Kostovicova, Denisa & Marlies Glasius. (2011). Bottom-up politics : an agency-centred approach to globalization. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).5 indexed citations
10.
Scholte, Jan Aart, et al.. (2009). Global civil society yearbook 2009: poverty and activism. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam).5 indexed citations
Albrow, Martin, Helmut K. Anheier, Marlies Glasius, Monroe E. Price, & Mary Kaldor. (2008). Global civil society 2007/8: communicative power and democracy. Sage eBooks.38 indexed citations
Glasius, Marlies. (2006). The International Criminal Court. BiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library).64 indexed citations
15.
Glasius, Marlies & Mary Kaldor. (2005). Individuals First: A Human Security Strategy for the European Union.4 indexed citations
16.
Glasius, Marlies & Mary Kaldor. (2005). Individuals first: a human security doctrine for the European Union. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).2 indexed citations
Glasius, Marlies. (2003). How activists shaped the court. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science).
Anheier, Helmut K., Mary Kaldor, & Marlies Glasius. (2001). Global civil society. OPUS 4 (Zuse Institute Berlin).154 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.