Annelise Binois

403 citations
7 papers · 256 · h-index 5

Impact in

    • Conservation Techniques and Studies
  • Archeology top 2%
    • Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis
    • Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
    • Paleopathology and ancient diseases

Papers in

    • Human-Animal Interaction Studies 2
    • Forensic and Genetic Research 2
    • Identification and Quantification in Food 1

Annelise Binois

7 papers receiving 247 citations

Peers

Annelise Binois
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
  • Conservation 52
  • Archeology 142
  • Paleontology 60
  • Earth-Surface Processes 38
  • Classics 14
Replace Jiří Vnouček with:
Jiří Vnouček Denmark
Mary Garrison United Kingdom
Penelope Walton Rogers United Kingdom
Luise Ørsted Brandt Denmark
Irene Skals Denmark
Diana Samodova Denmark
Aidan Dodson United Kingdom
Peter F. Biehl United States
David Ben‐Shlomo Israel
Elizabeth R. Gebhard United States
Annelise Binois relative to Jiří Vnouček Denmark Jiří Vnouček's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jiří Vnouček · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Annelise Binois

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Annelise Binois's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annelise Binois with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annelise Binois more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Annelise Binois

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annelise Binois. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annelise Binois. The network helps show where Annelise Binois may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Annelise Binois, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Annelise Binois Line = papers co-authored together Annelise Binois links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 2015130
2 201754
3 201942
4 201316
5 20138
6
To cut a long tail short: the tail-docking and gelding of lambs in Western Europe. A Confrontation of Archaeological and Historical Sources
20164
7 20152

About Annelise Binois

Annelise Binois is a scholar working on Genetics, Molecular Biology, History, Archeology and Paleontology, having authored 7 papers that have together received 256 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies (2 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (2 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (2 papers), Historical and Archaeological Studies (1 paper), History of Medicine Studies (1 paper), Urological Disorders and Treatments (1 paper), Archaeology and ancient environmental studies (1 paper) and Identification and Quantification in Food (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Conservation (52 citations), Archeology (142 citations), Paleontology (60 citations), Earth-Surface Processes (38 citations) and Classics (14 citations). Annelise Binois has collaborated with scholars based in France, Denmark and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Sarah Fiddyment, Jiří Vnouček, Matthew J. Collins, Matthew D. Teasdale, Daniel G. Bradley, Umberto Albarella, Stephen J. Milner, Bruce Holsinger, Román Fischer and Kathryn M. Rudy. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Paleopathology, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Royal Society Open Science, Veterinary Record and Heritage Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact