Anne M. Blackburn
- Religious studies top 1%
- Indian and Buddhist Studies 6
- Anthropology top 5%
- Global Maritime and Colonial Histories 4
- Eurasian Exchange Networks 2
-
- Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography 10
- Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies 2
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Asian Studies and History 5
- Vietnamese History and Culture Studies 3
- Chinese history and philosophy 2
- Philosophy top 10%
- Co-authors
- Judy TaylorMichael PuettAnn TavesWìnnìfred Fallers SullivanChristine HelmerDavid MorganR. Michael FeenerRobert A. Orsi
- Journals
- Journal of Intellectual Disability Research (1 paper)American Water Works Association (1 paper)History and Theory (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth KoreaAustralia
In The Last Decade
Anne M. Blackburn
20 papers receiving 197 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Religious studies 82
- Anthropology 96
- Political Science and International Relations 123
- Sociology and Political Science 187
- Philosophy 36
Countries citing papers authored by Anne M. Blackburn
This map shows the geographic impact of Anne M. Blackburn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne M. Blackburn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne M. Blackburn more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anne M. Blackburn
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne M. Blackburn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne M. Blackburn. The network helps show where Anne M. Blackburn may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Anne M. Blackburn, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 31 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2010 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2007 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2006 | 8 | |
| 14 | 2001 | 55 | |
| 15 | Looking for the Vinaya: Monastic Discipline in the Practical Canons of the Theravāda | 1999 | 25 |
| 16 | 1999 | 7 | |
| 17 | Religion, Kinship and Buddhism: Ambedkar's Vision of a Moral Community | 1993 | 3 |
| 18 | 1983 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1983 | 1 | |
| 20 | 1978 | 7 |
About Anne M. Blackburn
Anne M. Blackburn is a scholar working on Religious studies, Anthropology and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 23 papers that have together received 272 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (10 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (6 papers), Asian Studies and History (5 papers), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (4 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (3 papers), Eurasian Exchange Networks (2 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (2 papers) and Chinese history and philosophy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (82 citations), Anthropology (96 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (123 citations). Anne M. Blackburn has collaborated with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Judy Taylor, Michael Puett, Ann Taves, Wìnnìfred Fallers Sullivan, Christine Helmer, David Morgan, R. Michael Feener, Robert A. Orsi, Marla F. Frederick and Talal Asad. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, American Water Works Association and History and Theory.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.