Anne G. Crocker
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 2%
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Tonia L. NichollsYanick CharetteMichael C. SetoDiane MorinGilles CôtéJean CaronCéline MercierM. Caulet
- Topics
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (55 papers)Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (38 papers)Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (31 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEJournal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Anne G. Crocker
110 papers receiving 2.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
- Clinical Psychology 1.4k
- Sociology and Political Science 847
- General Health Professions 475
- Psychiatry and Mental health 302
- Social Psychology 287
Countries citing papers authored by Anne G. Crocker
This map shows the geographic impact of Anne G. Crocker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne G. Crocker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne G. Crocker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anne G. Crocker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne G. Crocker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne G. Crocker. The network helps show where Anne G. Crocker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne G. Crocker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne G. Crocker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne G. Crocker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne G. Crocker. Anne G. Crocker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | Multiple Stakeholders’ Perspectives of Involuntary Treatment Orders: A Meta-synthesis of the Qualitative Evidence toward an Exploratory Model | 1 |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 28 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | 53 | |
| 17 | 51 | |
| 18 | 24 | |
| 19 | 40 | |
| 20 | 22 |
About Anne G. Crocker
Anne G. Crocker is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 119 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (55 papers), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (38 papers) and Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis (31 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.4k citations), Safety Research (206 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (302 citations). Anne G. Crocker has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Tonia L. Nicholls, Yanick Charette, Michael C. Seto, Diane Morin, Gilles Côté, Jean Caron, Céline Mercier, M. Caulet, Laurence Roy and Éric Latimer. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.