Anne Faber
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Oncology
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Karen SøgaardAndreas HoltermannKristian OvergaardJeanette Reffstrup ChristensenMarie Birk JørgensenJens Stern‐StraeterJørgen Vinsløv HansenKarl Hoermann
- Topics
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (8 papers)Cancer Cells and Metastasis (6 papers)Workplace Health and Well-being (5 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaBMC Public HealthErgonomics
- Partner nations
- GermanyDenmarkUnited States
In The Last Decade
Anne Faber
43 papers receiving 852 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
- General Health Professions 217
- Pharmacology 206
- Oncology 168
- Molecular Biology 166
- Genetics 108
Countries citing papers authored by Anne Faber
This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Faber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Faber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Faber more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Faber
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Faber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Faber. The network helps show where Anne Faber may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne Faber
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne Faber. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne Faber based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne Faber. Anne Faber is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 50 | |
| 6 | Unexpected alteration of β-catenin and c-KIT expression by 5-FU and docetaxel in p16-positive squamous cell carcinoma compared to HPV-negative HNSCC cells in vitro. | 4 |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 21 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 99 | |
| 12 | 48 | |
| 13 | 59 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 42 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | 31 | |
| 20 | 10 |
About Anne Faber
Anne Faber is a scholar working on Medical Laboratory Technology, Otorhinolaryngology and Pharmacology, having authored 44 papers that have together received 874 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (8 papers), Cancer Cells and Metastasis (6 papers) and Workplace Health and Well-being (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Laboratory Technology (62 citations), Occupational Therapy (73 citations) and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (63 citations). Anne Faber has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Denmark and United States. Frequent co-authors include Karen Søgaard, Andreas Holtermann, Kristian Overgaard, Jeanette Reffstrup Christensen, Marie Birk Jørgensen, Jens Stern‐Straeter, Jørgen Vinsløv Hansen, Karl Hoermann, Jesper Strøyer and Ulrich Goessler. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, BMC Public Health and Ergonomics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.