Anne Espeset
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 5%
- Genetics
- Ecology
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 10%
- Insect Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Emilie C. Snell‐RoodWilliam A. WhiteNathan I. MorehouseSarah E. HobbieRickey D. CothranPunidan D. JeyasinghMatthew L. ForisterArthur M. Shapiro
- Topics
- Plant and animal studies (7 papers)Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers)Animal Behavior and Reproduction (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Ecological ModelingEcology, Evolution, Behavior and SystematicsNature and Landscape Conservation
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesEvolutionProceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceSpain
In The Last Decade
Anne Espeset
9 papers receiving 312 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 187
- Genetics 99
- Ecology 83
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 82
- Insect Science 74
Countries citing papers authored by Anne Espeset
This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Espeset's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Espeset with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Espeset more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Espeset
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Espeset. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Espeset. The network helps show where Anne Espeset may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne Espeset
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne Espeset. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne Espeset based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne Espeset. Anne Espeset is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 69 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 42 | |
| 6 | 31 | |
| 7 | 16 | |
| 8 | 57 | |
| 9 | 70 |
About Anne Espeset
Anne Espeset is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 9 papers that have together received 314 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (7 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (3 papers) and Animal Behavior and Reproduction (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecological Modeling (54 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (187 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (82 citations). Anne Espeset has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Emilie C. Snell‐Rood, William A. White, Nathan I. Morehouse, Sarah E. Hobbie, Rickey D. Cothran, Punidan D. Jeyasingh, Matthew L. Forister, Arthur M. Shapiro, Joshua G. Harrison and Chris C. Nice. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Evolution and Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.