Annabritt Chisholm

1.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
8 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

Annabritt Chisholm is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Annabritt Chisholm has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in General Health Professions, 3 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and 2 papers in Health. Recurrent topics in Annabritt Chisholm's work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (3 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers) and Social Media in Health Education (2 papers). Annabritt Chisholm is often cited by papers focused on Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (3 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (2 papers) and Social Media in Health Education (2 papers). Annabritt Chisholm collaborates with scholars based in Canada, Australia and Chile. Annabritt Chisholm's co-authors include Lisa Hartling, Shannon D. Scott, Andrea Milne, Jocelyn Shulhan, Michele P Hamm, Purnima Sundar, Amanda S. Newton, Denise Thomson, Donna M Dryden and Lisa M. Given and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Physical Therapy and Academic Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Annabritt Chisholm

8 papers receiving 977 citations

Hit Papers

Prevalence and Effect of Cyberbullying on Children and Yo... 2015 2026 2018 2022 2015 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Annabritt Chisholm Canada 8 341 258 249 231 194 8 1.0k
Jocelyn Shulhan Canada 9 399 1.2× 349 1.4× 256 1.0× 341 1.5× 220 1.1× 9 1.2k
Michele P. Dyson Canada 16 174 0.5× 282 1.1× 70 0.3× 80 0.3× 49 0.3× 38 823
Jennifer M. Whitehill United States 19 319 0.9× 221 0.9× 55 0.2× 169 0.7× 68 0.4× 38 1.0k
Sunmoo Yoon United States 14 251 0.7× 316 1.2× 87 0.3× 158 0.7× 38 0.2× 47 954
Tsung‐Lan Chu Taiwan 19 190 0.6× 358 1.4× 106 0.4× 168 0.7× 83 0.4× 39 1.0k
Caroline J. Kistin United States 14 548 1.6× 181 0.7× 103 0.4× 49 0.2× 506 2.6× 42 1.1k
Teresa E. Stone Australia 21 442 1.3× 358 1.4× 168 0.7× 54 0.2× 93 0.5× 61 1.3k
William H. Yeaton United States 17 145 0.4× 347 1.3× 196 0.8× 26 0.1× 221 1.1× 48 1.6k
Anita Stern Canada 9 305 0.9× 507 2.0× 186 0.7× 218 0.9× 39 0.2× 13 1.2k
Stephanie L. Ayers United States 22 404 1.2× 534 2.1× 170 0.7× 283 1.2× 166 0.9× 94 1.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Annabritt Chisholm

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Annabritt Chisholm's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Annabritt Chisholm with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Annabritt Chisholm more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Annabritt Chisholm

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Annabritt Chisholm. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Annabritt Chisholm. The network helps show where Annabritt Chisholm may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Annabritt Chisholm

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Annabritt Chisholm. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Annabritt Chisholm based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Annabritt Chisholm. Annabritt Chisholm is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Dyson, Michele P., Lisa Hartling, Jocelyn Shulhan, et al.. (2016). A Systematic Review of Social Media Use to Discuss and View Deliberate Self-Harm Acts. PLoS ONE. 11(5). e0155813–e0155813. 128 indexed citations
2.
Hamm, Michele P, Amanda S. Newton, Annabritt Chisholm, et al.. (2015). Prevalence and Effect of Cyberbullying on Children and Young People. JAMA Pediatrics. 169(8). 770–770. 307 indexed citations breakdown →
3.
Armijo‐Olivo, Susan, Greta G. Cummings, Jorge Fuentes, et al.. (2014). Identifying Items to Assess Methodological Quality in Physical Therapy Trials: A Factor Analysis. Physical Therapy. 94(9). 1272–1284. 17 indexed citations
4.
Hamm, Michele P, Annabritt Chisholm, Jocelyn Shulhan, et al.. (2013). Social Media Use by Health Care Professionals and Trainees. Academic Medicine. 88(9). 1376–1383. 102 indexed citations
5.
Thomson, Denise, Michelle Foisy, Marta Oleszczuk, et al.. (2013). Overview of reviews in child health: evidence synthesis and the knowledge base for a specific population. Evidence-Based Child Health A Cochrane Review Journal. 8(1). 3–10. 19 indexed citations
6.
Hamm, Michele P, Annabritt Chisholm, Jocelyn Shulhan, et al.. (2013). Social media use among patients and caregivers: a scoping review. BMJ Open. 3(5). e002819–e002819. 259 indexed citations
7.
Hartling, Lisa, Annabritt Chisholm, Denise Thomson, & Donna M Dryden. (2012). A Descriptive Analysis of Overviews of Reviews Published between 2000 and 2011. PLoS ONE. 7(11). e49667–e49667. 161 indexed citations
8.
Chisholm, Annabritt, Lisa Tjosvold, Denise Thomson, et al.. (2010). A descriptive analysis of child-relevant systematic reviews in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. BMC Pediatrics. 10(1). 34–34. 20 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026