Anna Ursula Dreher
- General Psychology top 10%
- Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology 1
-
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications 7
- Psychiatric care and mental health services 1
- Cultural Studies top 10%
- Psychoanalysis and Social Critique 3
-
- Psychology, Coaching, and Therapy 2
-
- Health and Medical Studies 1
- Health, psychology, and well-being 1
-
- Education and Public Policy 1
- Co-authors
- Joseph SandlerAlex HolderChristopher DareRobert S. WallersteinJürgen KörnerDiana PflichthoferMichael ErmannUlrich Lamparter
- Journals
- Psychoanalytic Psychology (1 paper)Forum der Psychoanalyse (6 papers)Medical Entomology and Zoology (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustriaKazakhstanGermany
In The Last Decade
Anna Ursula Dreher
11 papers receiving 48 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- General Psychology 16
- Clinical Psychology 55
- Cultural Studies 13
- Applied Psychology 6
- Philosophy 10
Countries citing papers authored by Anna Ursula Dreher
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Ursula Dreher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Ursula Dreher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Ursula Dreher more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Ursula Dreher
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Ursula Dreher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Ursula Dreher. The network helps show where Anna Ursula Dreher may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Anna Ursula Dreher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 9 | Pluralismo na teoria e na pesquisa: e agora? | 2008 | 2 |
| 10 | 2007 | 2 | |
| 11 | Was wollen die Psychoanalytiker? : das Problem der Ziele in der psychoanalytischen Behandlung | 1999 | 4 |
| 12 | 1999 | 9 | |
| 13 | Freud's Models of the Mind: An Introduction | 1997 | 6 |
| 14 | What Do Psychoanalysts Want? The Problem of Aims in Psychoanalysis | 1996 | 2 |
| 15 | What Do Psychoanalysts Want?: The Problem of Aims in Psychoanalytic Therapy | 1996 | 36 |
About Anna Ursula Dreher
Anna Ursula Dreher is a scholar working on General Psychology, Cultural Studies and Clinical Psychology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 76 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (7 papers), Psychoanalysis and Social Critique (3 papers), Psychology, Coaching, and Therapy (2 papers), Psychiatric care and mental health services (1 paper), Health and Medical Studies (1 paper), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (1 paper), Health, psychology, and well-being (1 paper) and Education and Public Policy (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (16 citations), Clinical Psychology (55 citations) and Cultural Studies (13 citations). Anna Ursula Dreher has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Kazakhstan and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Joseph Sandler, Alex Holder, Christopher Dare, Robert S. Wallerstein, Jürgen Körner, Diana Pflichthofer, Michael Ermann, Ulrich Lamparter, Cord Benecke and Timo Storck. Their work appears in journals such as Psychoanalytic Psychology, Forum der Psychoanalyse and Medical Entomology and Zoology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.