Anna Stepanova

420 total citations
11 papers, 265 citations indexed

About

Anna Stepanova is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Safety Research and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna Stepanova has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 265 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 3 papers in Safety Research and 2 papers in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in Anna Stepanova's work include Merger and Competition Analysis (6 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (4 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (3 papers). Anna Stepanova is often cited by papers focused on Merger and Competition Analysis (6 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (4 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (3 papers). Anna Stepanova collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Denmark and United States. Anna Stepanova's co-authors include Rabah Amir and Edward Cartwright and has published in prestigious journals such as Economics Letters, Games and Economic Behavior and International Journal of Game Theory.

In The Last Decade

Anna Stepanova

11 papers receiving 259 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Anna Stepanova United Kingdom	7	172	88	77	59	42	11	265
Alex Thevaranjan United States	7	56 0.3×	80 0.9×	36 0.5×	49 0.8×	65 1.5×	19	301
Laurent Linnemer France	10	149 0.9×	60 0.7×	64 0.8×	44 0.7×	6 0.1×	15	228
Elena Krasnokutskaya United States	7	120 0.7×	93 1.1×	127 1.6×	211 3.6×	49 1.2×	13	273
Kei Kawai United States	8	157 0.9×	43 0.5×	61 0.8×	82 1.4×	15 0.4×	19	236
G. Christopher Crawford United States	8	93 0.5×	59 0.7×	13 0.2×	33 0.6×	20 0.5×	18	297
Catherine de Fontenay Australia	6	174 1.0×	85 1.0×	44 0.6×	43 0.7×	9 0.2×	16	246
Douglas Dyer United States	5	112 0.7×	82 0.9×	95 1.2×	220 3.7×	29 0.7×	6	330
Daniel J. Richards United States	8	218 1.3×	80 0.9×	77 1.0×	32 0.5×	13 0.3×	23	290
Maria Arbatskaya United States	7	188 1.1×	141 1.6×	237 3.1×	149 2.5×	29 0.7×	23	354
Lorenzo Ciari Germany	8	236 1.4×	87 1.0×	45 0.6×	15 0.3×	3 0.1×	10	307

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Stepanova

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Stepanova's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Stepanova with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Stepanova more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Stepanova

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Stepanova. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Stepanova. The network helps show where Anna Stepanova may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Stepanova

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Stepanova. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Stepanova based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Stepanova. Anna Stepanova is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Stepanova, Anna, et al.. (2021). THE IMPACT OF THE TRANSPORT SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT ON THE ECONOMIC COMPETITIVENESS OF MEGAPOLISES. Bulletin of the Altai Academy of Economics and law. 2(№4 2021). 205–212. 1 indexed citations

2.

Cartwright, Edward & Anna Stepanova. (2017). Efficiency in a forced contribution threshold public good game. International Journal of Game Theory. 46(4). 1163–1191. 4 indexed citations

3.

Cartwright, Edward & Anna Stepanova. (2015). The consequences of a refund in threshold public good games. Economics Letters. 134. 29–33. 6 indexed citations

4.

Cartwright, Edward, et al.. (2013). Explaining Success Rates at Providing Threshold Public Goods: An Approach Based on Impulse Balance Theory. SSRN Electronic Journal. 3 indexed citations

5.

Stepanova, Anna, et al.. (2013). On the prisoner’s dilemma in R&D with input spillovers and incentives for R&D cooperation. Mathematical Social Sciences. 66(3). 254–261. 20 indexed citations

6.

Cartwright, Edward & Anna Stepanova. (2012). What do Students Learn from a Classroom Experiment: Not much, Unless they Write a Report on it. The Journal of Economic Education. 43(1). 48–57. 39 indexed citations

7.

Stepanova, Anna, et al.. (2010). R&D WITH SPILLOVERS: MONOPOLY VERSUS NONCOOPERATIVE AND COOPERATIVE DUOPOLY. Manchester School. 79(1). 125–144. 25 indexed citations

8.

Amir, Rabah & Anna Stepanova. (2005). Second-mover advantage and price leadership in Bertrand duopoly. Games and Economic Behavior. 55(1). 1–20. 145 indexed citations

9.

Amir, Rabah & Anna Stepanova. (2004). Second-Mover Advantage and Price Leadership in Bertrand Oligopoly. SSRN Electronic Journal. 13 indexed citations

10.

Amir, Rabah, et al.. (2002). Monopoly versus R&D‐integrated Duopoly. Manchester School. 70(1). 88–100. 8 indexed citations

11.

Amir, Rabah, et al.. (2001). Monopoly versus R&D-integrated Duopoly. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact