Anna Stefaniak
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology
- Health top 10%
- Modeling and Simulation top 5%
- Co-authors
- Michael J. A. WohlFrank J. ElgarMichał BilewiczMaria LewickaAnouk SmeekesPaulina GórskaMarta MarchlewskaMagdalena Budziszewska
- Topics
- Social and Intergroup Psychology (14 papers)Cultural Differences and Values (8 papers)Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers)
- Journals
- Social Science & MedicinePersonality and Individual DifferencesCurrent Directions in Psychological Science
- Partner nations
- CanadaPolandUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Anna Stefaniak
29 papers receiving 618 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Sociology and Political Science 381
- Social Psychology 202
- Clinical Psychology 103
- Health 74
- Modeling and Simulation 74
Countries citing papers authored by Anna Stefaniak
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Stefaniak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Stefaniak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Stefaniak more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Stefaniak
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Stefaniak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Stefaniak. The network helps show where Anna Stefaniak may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Stefaniak
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Stefaniak. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Stefaniak based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Stefaniak. Anna Stefaniak is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 9 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 13 | |
| 16 | 210 | |
| 17 | 22 | |
| 18 | 29 | |
| 19 | 70 | |
| 20 | 83 |
About Anna Stefaniak
Anna Stefaniak is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Gender Studies and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 32 papers that have together received 635 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (14 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (8 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Modeling and Simulation (74 citations), Social Psychology (202 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (381 citations). Anna Stefaniak has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Poland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Michael J. A. Wohl, Frank J. Elgar, Michał Bilewicz, Maria Lewicka, Anouk Smeekes, Paulina Górska, Marta Marchlewska, Magdalena Budziszewska, Oliwia Maciantowicz and Robyn K. Mallett. Their work appears in journals such as Social Science & Medicine, Personality and Individual Differences and Current Directions in Psychological Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.