Anna Scott
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 1%
- Plant Science top 5%
- Insect Science top 1%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Genetics top 10%
- Co-authors
- Simon G. PottsLynne M. OsgathorpeJane MemmottMark A. GoddardNadine MitschunasGraham N. StoneKatherine C. R. BaldockD. M. Hicks
- Topics
- Plant and animal studies (3 papers)Land Use and Ecosystem Services (3 papers)Forest Management and Policy (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and SystematicsInsect ScienceNature and Landscape Conservation
- Journals
- PLoS ONEProceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesGlobal Ecology and Biogeography
- Partner nations
- United KingdomGreecePoland
In The Last Decade
Anna Scott
7 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 889
- Plant Science 504
- Insect Science 439
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 403
- Genetics 220
Countries citing papers authored by Anna Scott
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Scott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Scott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Scott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Scott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Scott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Scott. The network helps show where Anna Scott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Scott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Scott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Scott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Scott. Anna Scott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | A systems approach reveals urban pollinator hotspots and conservation opportunitiesbreakdown → | 345 |
| 2 | Corporate implications of longer lives | 12 |
| 3 | 262 | |
| 4 | 25 | |
| 5 | Where is the UK's pollinator biodiversity? The importance of urban areas for flower-visiting insectsbreakdown → | 459 |
| 6 | 63 | |
| 7 | 44 |
About Anna Scott
Anna Scott is a scholar working on Ecological Modeling, Global and Planetary Change and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 7 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Plant and animal studies (3 papers), Land Use and Ecosystem Services (3 papers) and Forest Management and Policy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (889 citations), Insect Science (439 citations) and Nature and Landscape Conservation (403 citations). Anna Scott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Greece and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Simon G. Potts, Lynne M. Osgathorpe, Jane Memmott, Mark A. Goddard, Nadine Mitschunas, Graham N. Stone, Katherine C. R. Baldock, D. M. Hicks, William E. Kunin and Ian P. Vaughan. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences and Global Ecology and Biogeography.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.