Anna N. Bukiya
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 2%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Physiology
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Alex M. DopicoAlejandro M. DopicoA.K. SinghJianxi LiuAvia Rosenhouse‐DantskerThirumalini VaithianathanAbby L. ParrillLigia Toro
- Topics
- Ion channel regulation and function (59 papers)Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (50 papers)Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (19 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussiaCanada
In The Last Decade
Anna N. Bukiya
90 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Molecular Biology 1.1k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 707
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 382
- Physiology 161
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 127
Countries citing papers authored by Anna N. Bukiya
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna N. Bukiya's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna N. Bukiya with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna N. Bukiya more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna N. Bukiya
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna N. Bukiya. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna N. Bukiya. The network helps show where Anna N. Bukiya may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna N. Bukiya
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna N. Bukiya. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna N. Bukiya based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna N. Bukiya. Anna N. Bukiya is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 30 | |
| 11 | 29 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 22 | |
| 16 | 38 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 8 |
About Anna N. Bukiya
Anna N. Bukiya is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Neurology, having authored 93 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ion channel regulation and function (59 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (50 papers) and Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (707 citations), Aging (37 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (382 citations). Anna N. Bukiya has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Alex M. Dopico, Alejandro M. Dopico, A.K. Singh, Jianxi Liu, Avia Rosenhouse‐Dantsker, Thirumalini Vaithianathan, Abby L. Parrill, Ligia Toro, Jonathan H. Jaggar and Scott D. Rychnovsky. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Circulation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.