Anna Moore
Impact in
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Family and Disability Support Research
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Papers in
-
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 3
- Child Abuse and Trauma 1
- Resilience and Mental Health 1
- Family and Disability Support Research 1
-
- Health Policy Implementation Science 1
- Co-authors
- Patricia Howlin (1 shared paper)Rosie Mansfield (6 shared papers)Daniel Hayes (6 shared papers)Emma Ashworth (5 shared papers)Jessica Deighton (5 shared papers)Emily Stapley (5 shared papers)Sofia Stathi (1 shared paper)Praveetha Patalay (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Trials (2 papers)Anthrozoös (1 paper)The Journal of Social Psychology (1 paper)European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (1 paper)Autism (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Anna Moore
14 papers receiving 470 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Cognitive Neuroscience 317
- Clinical Psychology 275
- Psychiatry and Mental health 77
- Education 117
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 42
Countries citing papers authored by Anna Moore
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Moore more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Moore
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Moore. The network helps show where Anna Moore may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Anna Moore, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1997 | 358 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 26 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 26 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 25 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 23 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 3 | |
| 12 | The crisis in CAMHS: Can I-Thrive provide a solution? | 2016 | 2 |
| 13 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 1 |
About Anna Moore
Anna Moore is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Cognitive Neuroscience, Health and Social Psychology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 510 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (1 paper), Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (1 paper), Child Abuse and Trauma (1 paper), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (1 paper), Resilience and Mental Health (1 paper), Family and Disability Support Research (1 paper) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (317 citations), Clinical Psychology (275 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (77 citations), Education (117 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (42 citations). Anna Moore has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Patricia Howlin, Rosie Mansfield, Daniel Hayes, Emma Ashworth, Jessica Deighton, Emily Stapley, Sofia Stathi, Praveetha Patalay, Neil Humphrey and João Roberto dos Santos. Their work appears in journals such as Trials, Anthrozoös, The Journal of Social Psychology, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry and Autism.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.