Anna M. Barrett
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 0.5%
- Pharmacology top 0.5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Rehabilitation top 0.5%
- Co-authors
- Kenneth M. HeilmanStephen M. KosslynPeii ChenKelly M. GoedertOlivier KoenigCarolyn Backer CaveGregory P. CrucianKimberly Hreha
- Topics
- Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (82 papers)Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (38 papers)Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (23 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesSHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaNeurology
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaItaly
In The Last Decade
Anna M. Barrett
155 papers receiving 4.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 145
- Cognitive Neuroscience 3.1k
- Pharmacology 922
- Psychiatry and Mental health 567
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 536
- Rehabilitation 520
Countries citing papers authored by Anna M. Barrett
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna M. Barrett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna M. Barrett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna M. Barrett more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna M. Barrett
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna M. Barrett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna M. Barrett. The network helps show where Anna M. Barrett may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna M. Barrett
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna M. Barrett. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna M. Barrett based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna M. Barrett. Anna M. Barrett is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 24 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | A comprehensive review of nongenetic prognostic and predictive factors influencing the heterogeneity of outcomes in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer | 1 |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 36 | |
| 13 | 33 | |
| 14 | 52 | |
| 15 | 31 | |
| 16 | 65 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 54 | |
| 19 | INFLUENCE OF THYROID HORMONE ON ERYTHROPOIESIS IN IRRADIATED RATS | 0 |
| 20 | INTEREST TESTING WITH THE MENTALLY RETARDED: A BI-SENSORY APPROACH. | 2 |
About Anna M. Barrett
Anna M. Barrett is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Rehabilitation and Pharmacology, having authored 164 papers that have together received 4.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (82 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (38 papers) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (23 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (3.1k citations), Rehabilitation (520 citations) and Pharmacology (922 citations). Anna M. Barrett has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth M. Heilman, Stephen M. Kosslyn, Peii Chen, Kelly M. Goedert, Olivier Koenig, Carolyn Backer Cave, Gregory P. Crucian, Kimberly Hreha, John C. Adair and Emily J. Goldknopf. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.