Anna M. Barrett

7.4k total citations
164 papers, 4.9k citations indexed

About

Anna M. Barrett is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Pharmacology and Rehabilitation. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna M. Barrett has authored 164 papers receiving a total of 4.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 105 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 40 papers in Pharmacology and 23 papers in Rehabilitation. Recurrent topics in Anna M. Barrett's work include Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (82 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (38 papers) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (23 papers). Anna M. Barrett is often cited by papers focused on Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (82 papers), Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (38 papers) and Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery (23 papers). Anna M. Barrett collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and Italy. Anna M. Barrett's co-authors include Kenneth M. Heilman, Stephen M. Kosslyn, Peii Chen, Kelly M. Goedert, Olivier Koenig, Carolyn Backer Cave, Gregory P. Crucian, Kimberly Hreha, John C. Adair and Emily J. Goldknopf and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Neurology.

In The Last Decade

Anna M. Barrett

155 papers receiving 4.7k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anna M. Barrett United States 38 3.1k 922 567 536 520 164 4.9k
Gilles Rode France 42 5.5k 1.8× 1.5k 1.7× 522 0.9× 197 0.4× 578 1.1× 192 6.7k
Cecilia Guariglia Italy 38 3.6k 1.2× 493 0.5× 670 1.2× 920 1.7× 249 0.5× 194 5.5k
Pierluigi Zoccolotti Italy 44 3.6k 1.2× 453 0.5× 429 0.8× 461 0.9× 339 0.7× 176 5.8k
Dawn Bowers United States 54 5.8k 1.9× 517 0.6× 1.5k 2.6× 1.0k 1.9× 170 0.3× 215 10.1k
Gabriella Bottini Italy 36 3.4k 1.1× 485 0.5× 1.0k 1.8× 702 1.3× 156 0.3× 147 5.0k
Roberto Sterzi Italy 32 2.3k 0.7× 342 0.4× 526 0.9× 450 0.8× 563 1.1× 99 4.7k
Gabriella Antonucci Italy 35 2.4k 0.8× 718 0.8× 724 1.3× 237 0.4× 1.2k 2.4× 94 4.1k
Peter W. Halligan United Kingdom 60 9.8k 3.1× 2.4k 2.6× 2.2k 4.0× 979 1.8× 847 1.6× 203 13.4k
Giuliano Geminiani Italy 39 3.4k 1.1× 548 0.6× 1.1k 1.9× 721 1.3× 95 0.2× 101 5.2k
Sylvie Chokron France 37 2.8k 0.9× 407 0.4× 251 0.4× 468 0.9× 58 0.1× 139 4.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Anna M. Barrett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna M. Barrett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna M. Barrett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna M. Barrett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna M. Barrett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna M. Barrett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna M. Barrett. The network helps show where Anna M. Barrett may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna M. Barrett

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna M. Barrett. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna M. Barrett based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna M. Barrett. Anna M. Barrett is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Guo, Haidan, Anna M. Barrett, Raha Dastgheyb, et al.. (2025). Neuropathologic findings in a community-based autopsy cohort of older, virally suppressed, people with HIV. Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology. 84(12). 1094–1105.
2.
Knutson, Jayme S., Mary Y. Harley, David A. Cunningham, et al.. (2025). Contralaterally Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation for Upper Extremity Recovery Following Stroke: A Multisite Randomized Controlled Trial. Stroke. 57(2). 338–348.
3.
Brown, Felicity L., Anna M. Barrett, Eve S. Puffer, et al.. (2024). Nurturing families: A feasibility randomised controlled trial of a whole-family intervention with vulnerable families in Jordan. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 11. e51–e51. 4 indexed citations
4.
Hreha, Kimberly, et al.. (2022). Effect of Missed Items on the Reliability of the Kessler Foundation Neglect Assessment Process. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 103(11). 2145–2152. 2 indexed citations
6.
Vasileva, Mira, Elizabeth J. Schilpzand, Rowena Conroy, et al.. (2021). Children’s daily life after potentially traumatic injury: A naturalistic observation study.. Traumatology An International Journal. 28(1). 129–137. 3 indexed citations
7.
Barrett, Anna M., et al.. (2019). Update on the Clinical Approach to Spatial Neglect. Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports. 19(5). 25–25. 24 indexed citations
8.
Barrett, Anna M., et al.. (2016). Patching for Diplopia Contraindicated in Patients with Brain Injury?. Optometry and Vision Science. 94(1). 120–124. 5 indexed citations
9.
Wagner, Daymond, Paul J. Eslinger, & Anna M. Barrett. (2016). Decreased leftward ‘aiming’ motor-intentional spatial cuing in traumatic brain injury.. Neuropsychology. 30(6). 731–741. 1 indexed citations
10.
Barrett, Anna M., et al.. (2014). A comprehensive review of nongenetic prognostic and predictive factors influencing the heterogeneity of outcomes in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1 indexed citations
11.
Galletta, Elizabeth E., et al.. (2014). Assessment of Neglect Dyslexia With Functional Reading Materials. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 21(1). 75–86. 16 indexed citations
12.
Barrett, Anna M., et al.. (2013). Rehabilitation of spatial neglect. Handbook of clinical neurology. 110. 347–355. 36 indexed citations
13.
Chen, Peii, et al.. (2011). Spatial Bias and Right Hemisphere Function: Sex-Specific Changes with Aging. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 17(3). 455–462. 33 indexed citations
14.
Goedert, Kelly M., et al.. (2010). Asymmetrical Effects of Adaptation to Left- and Right-Shifting Prisms Depends on Pre-existing Attentional Biases. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 16(5). 795–804. 52 indexed citations
15.
Garza, John P., Paul J. Eslinger, & Anna M. Barrett. (2008). Perceptual–attentional and motor-intentional bias in near and far space. Brain and Cognition. 68(1). 9–14. 31 indexed citations
16.
Eslinger, Paul J., et al.. (2007). Emotional Perception Deficits in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology. 20(2). 79–82. 65 indexed citations
17.
Barrett, Anna M., et al.. (2003). Age-dependent Recall Bias for Material of Internal versus External Origin. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology. 16(3). 160–169. 5 indexed citations
18.
Keillor, Jocelyn, et al.. (2002). Emotional experience and perception in the absence of facial feedback. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society. 8(1). 130–135. 54 indexed citations
19.
Barrett, Anna M.. (1965). INFLUENCE OF THYROID HORMONE ON ERYTHROPOIESIS IN IRRADIATED RATS. PubMed. 8(7). 28–9.
20.
Barrett, Anna M., et al.. (1965). INTEREST TESTING WITH THE MENTALLY RETARDED: A BI-SENSORY APPROACH.. PubMed. 69. 548–52. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026