Anna Jo Bodurtha Smith
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 2%
- Reproductive Medicine top 5%
- Epidemiology
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- Amanda N. FaderEdward J. TannerSanjay KinraAnna BeavisJoann BodurthaPeter BulovaMary StephensStephanie L. Santoro
- Topics
- Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer (16 papers)Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (13 papers)Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (12 papers)
- Cited by
- Obstetrics and GynecologyReproductive MedicinePublic Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomAustralia
In The Last Decade
Anna Jo Bodurtha Smith
61 papers receiving 877 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 284
- Reproductive Medicine 201
- Epidemiology 181
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 154
- Molecular Biology 111
Countries citing papers authored by Anna Jo Bodurtha Smith
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Jo Bodurtha Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Jo Bodurtha Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Jo Bodurtha Smith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Jo Bodurtha Smith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Jo Bodurtha Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Jo Bodurtha Smith. The network helps show where Anna Jo Bodurtha Smith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Jo Bodurtha Smith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Jo Bodurtha Smith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Jo Bodurtha Smith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Jo Bodurtha Smith. Anna Jo Bodurtha Smith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 16 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 25 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 15 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 17 | |
| 20 | Prediction of Music Performance Anxiety via Personality and Trait Anxiety in Young Musicians | 13 |
About Anna Jo Bodurtha Smith
Anna Jo Bodurtha Smith is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 70 papers that have together received 896 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer (16 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (13 papers) and Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Obstetrics and Gynecology (284 citations), Reproductive Medicine (201 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (154 citations). Anna Jo Bodurtha Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Amanda N. Fader, Edward J. Tanner, Sanjay Kinra, Anna Beavis, Joann Bodurtha, Peter Bulova, Mary Stephens, Stephanie L. Santoro, Moya Peterson and George T. Capone. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Brain and PEDIATRICS.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.