Emily Ko

3.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
186 papers, 2.1k citations indexed

About

Emily Ko is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Emily Ko has authored 186 papers receiving a total of 2.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 87 papers in Reproductive Medicine, 86 papers in Obstetrics and Gynecology and 46 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Emily Ko's work include Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (84 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (70 papers) and Uterine Myomas and Treatments (32 papers). Emily Ko is often cited by papers focused on Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments (84 papers), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (70 papers) and Uterine Myomas and Treatments (32 papers). Emily Ko collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Italy. Emily Ko's co-authors include Ashley Haggerty, Nawar Latif, Dimitrios Nasioudis, Robert Giuntoli, Paola A. Gehrig, Mark A. Morgan, Robert A. Burger, Victoria Bae‐Jump, Angeles Alvarez Secord and Leslie H. Clark and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Communications, Journal of Clinical Oncology and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

In The Last Decade

Emily Ko

172 papers receiving 2.1k citations

Hit Papers

Randomized Phase II Trial of Nivolumab Versus Nivolumab a... 2020 2026 2022 2024 2020 50 100 150 200

Peers

Emily Ko
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 815
  • Reproductive Medicine 798
  • Oncology 669
  • Surgery 428
  • Epidemiology 287
Replace James Java with:
James Java United States
June Y. Hou United States
Maaike A. van der Aa Netherlands
Wendy R. Brewster United States
Francesco Plotti Italy
Murat Gültekin Türkiye
Michael McHale United States
Luigi Frigerio Italy
Olivier Graesslin France
Teresa Díaz-Montes United States
James Java United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Emily Ko
Emily Ko · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Emily Ko
Emily Ko · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Emily Ko

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emily Ko's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emily Ko with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emily Ko more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emily Ko

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emily Ko. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emily Ko. The network helps show where Emily Ko may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Emily Ko

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Emily Ko. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Emily Ko based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Emily Ko. Emily Ko is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 1
5 0
6 13
7 5
8 2
9 2
10 1
11 1
12 5
13 11
14
Randomized Phase II Trial of Nivolumab Versus Nivolumab and Ipilimumab for Recurrent or Persistent Ovarian Cancer: An NRG Oncology Study breakdown →
224
15 2
16 7
17 9
18 46
19 11
20 1

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026