Anna I. Corwin
- Sociology and Political Science
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology top 5%
- General Health Professions
- Social Psychology
- Health
- Co-authors
- Sarah LambToni CalasantiNeal KingCordelia Erickson‐DavisLucía AlcaláAndrew D. CoppensT. M. LuhrmannLianne M. Kurina
- Topics
- Aging and Gerontology Research (4 papers)Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (4 papers)Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (3 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaJournal of the American Geriatrics SocietyFrontiers in Psychology
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussiaJapan
In The Last Decade
Anna I. Corwin
14 papers receiving 189 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Sociology and Political Science 72
- Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 46
- General Health Professions 46
- Social Psychology 32
- Health 29
Countries citing papers authored by Anna I. Corwin
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna I. Corwin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna I. Corwin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna I. Corwin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna I. Corwin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna I. Corwin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna I. Corwin. The network helps show where Anna I. Corwin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna I. Corwin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna I. Corwin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna I. Corwin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna I. Corwin. Anna I. Corwin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | Successful Aging as a Contemporary Obsession: Global Perspectives | 68 |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 23 | |
| 11 | Growing Old with God: An Alternative Vision of Aging Well | 1 |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | Why Do Nuns Outlive the Rest of Us: Six Tips for Healthy Aging | 0 |
| 14 | 22 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | Language and Gender Variance: Constructing Gender beyond the Male/female Binary | 18 |
About Anna I. Corwin
Anna I. Corwin is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Health and Clinical Psychology, having authored 16 papers that have together received 208 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aging and Gerontology Research (4 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (4 papers) and Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (46 citations), Health (29 citations) and Gender Studies (26 citations). Anna I. Corwin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Russia and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Sarah Lamb, Toni Calasanti, Neal King, Cordelia Erickson‐Davis, Lucía Alcalá, Andrew D. Coppens, T. M. Luhrmann, Lianne M. Kurina, Kara Weisman and Jeremy N. Bailenson. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society and Frontiers in Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.