Anna Dienhart
Impact in
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Gender Roles and Identity Studies
- Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
- Demography top 5%
- Family Dynamics and Relationships
Papers in
-
- Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving 4
- Work-Family Balance Challenges 3
-
- Gender Roles and Identity Studies 5
- Co-authors
- Judith Myers Avis (2 shared papers)Olga Sutherland (2 shared papers)Kerry Daly (1 shared paper)Jonathan D. Schmidt (1 shared paper)Rudy Ray Seward (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Marital and Family Therapy (4 papers)Journal of Marriage and the Family (1 paper)Teaching Sociology (1 paper)Journal of Family Issues (1 paper)Journal of Feminist Family Therapy (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Anna Dienhart
13 papers receiving 236 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Gender Studies 110
- Demography 83
- Clinical Psychology 84
- Sociology and Political Science 164
- Social Psychology 62
Countries citing papers authored by Anna Dienhart
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Dienhart's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Dienhart with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Dienhart more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Dienhart
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Dienhart. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Dienhart. The network helps show where Anna Dienhart may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 5 scholars most cited alongside Anna Dienhart, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 79 | |
| 2 | 1998 | 76 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 37 | |
| 4 | 1994 | 21 | |
| 5 | 2001 | 17 | |
| 6 | 2007 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2001 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2009 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2012 | 4 | |
| 11 | 1991 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1999 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1999 | 1 |
About Anna Dienhart
Anna Dienhart is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Demography and Clinical Psychology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 278 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender Roles and Identity Studies (5 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (4 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (3 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (3 papers), Work-Family Balance Challenges (3 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (2 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (2 papers) and Counseling Practices and Supervision (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (110 citations), Demography (83 citations), Clinical Psychology (84 citations), Sociology and Political Science (164 citations) and Social Psychology (62 citations). Anna Dienhart has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Judith Myers Avis, Olga Sutherland, Kerry Daly, Jonathan D. Schmidt and Rudy Ray Seward. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, Journal of Marriage and the Family, Teaching Sociology, Journal of Family Issues and Journal of Feminist Family Therapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.