Anna Day

610 total citations
20 papers, 468 citations indexed

About

Anna Day is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Physiology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Anna Day has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 468 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, 6 papers in Physiology and 3 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Anna Day's work include Asthma and respiratory diseases (4 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (3 papers) and Respiratory and Cough-Related Research (2 papers). Anna Day is often cited by papers focused on Asthma and respiratory diseases (4 papers), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research (3 papers) and Respiratory and Cough-Related Research (2 papers). Anna Day collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Anna Day's co-authors include Gillian M. Griffiths, Terry J. Hamblin, Jane C. Stinchcombe, Sarah Booth, Giovanna Bossi, Richard H. Clark, E. Graham Davies, Paul Hernandez, Lehana Thabane and Jean Bourbeau and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature Immunology, Journal of Investigative Dermatology and Thorax.

In The Last Decade

Anna Day

18 papers receiving 448 citations

Peers

Anna Day
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 216
  • Physiology 149
  • Immunology 105
  • Cell Biology 82
  • Epidemiology 57
Replace Julie P. Katkin with:
Julie P. Katkin United States
Brendan Mullen Canada
Gudrun Bornhöft Germany
Lawrence E. Kurlandsky United States
Amy Cranston Canada
Antoaneta A. Toncheva Germany
R. Babela Slovakia
Melissa Porter United States
Laura Morrison United States
Pierre Lachance Canada
Julie P. Katkin United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to Anna Day
Anna Day · 1×
Citations per year, relative to Anna Day
Anna Day · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by Anna Day

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anna Day's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna Day with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna Day more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anna Day

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna Day. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna Day. The network helps show where Anna Day may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna Day

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna Day. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna Day based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna Day. Anna Day is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 4
2 0
3 9
4 1
5 25
6 23
7 132
8 2
9 10
10 1
11 185
12 11
13
Working therapeutically with angry clients
1
14
Lessons from the Women's Health Initiative: primary prevention and gender health.
8
15 5
16 8
17
Australian editorial election cartoons: Is there a change afoot?
1
18
Lessons in women's health: body image and pulmonary disease.
1
19
Women's health: the impetus for emerging models of healthcare.
2
20 39

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026